For the Firefox Developer Tools, we need to be able to hide the scrollbars of
a document (in the Responsive Design Tool).
I thought that loading an stylesheet that hide the scrollbars via the new
`loadSheet` method might help.
On 24/09/12 20:06, Jason Smith wrote:
3. For v1, we probably need to still stick to the original plan for
the UA that does include Android in the UA, even though that's
sub-optimal to receive Android specific content. We should move to
the optimal UA in long-term though without the platform
(Can you hear that thud, thud, thud? It's the sound of me beating my head
against my desk.)
One of the intriguing things about this benchmark is that it's open
source, and they're committed to changing it over time.
FWIW Paul Irish agrees the sieve is a bad test, although he doesn't
hate it to
3. For v1, we probably need to still stick to the original plan for
the UA that does include Android in the UA, even though that's
sub-optimal to receive Android specific content. We should move to
the optimal UA in long-term though without the platform identifier.
Do we really think we
Maybe this is naive of me, but I for one don't really believe in
tweaking benchmarks for the purposes of making Firefox look better.
If we look bad in a benchmark, badmouthing it seems somehow more
gentlemanly than stacking it. :)
Anyway, I filed a bug on getting rid of the microbenchmarks,
Paul Rouget wrote:
For the Firefox Developer Tools, we need to be able to hide the scrollbars of a document
(in the Responsive Design Tool).
Scrollbars are native anonymous content so most stylesheets just don't
see them (the obvious exception is of course
I didn't mean win, in fact I never said that. I simply meant if a test was
not written well or using an API improperly/poorly that we could correct things
like that. I certainly didn't mean we should game anything.
Regardless, my name is off the list, and I never knew it would be used that way.
Yeah, some were crashing that I tested (mostly canvas), but were fixed. Again,
I never intended this.
***dbuc returns to woodshed :(
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Yeah, press apparently didn't distinguish between the two - and I never asked,
or was placed on the Technical Adviser list.
On the bright side, I never saw Firefox lagging hardcore in my testing - in
fact, as this article corroborates, we can do pretty darn good on most tests,
and even took
On 9/25/12 7:54 AM, Paul Rouget wrote:
let win = gBrowser.contentWindow;
let gIOService =
Components.classes[@mozilla.org/network/io-service;1].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIIOService);
let windowUtils =
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 9/25/12 7:54 AM, Paul Rouget wrote:
let win = gBrowser.contentWindow;
let gIOService =
Components.classes[@mozilla.org/network/io-service;1].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIIOService);
let windowUtils =
On 26/09/12 04:25, daniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, press apparently didn't distinguish between the two - and I never asked,
or was placed on the Technical Adviser list.
No good deed goes unpunished.
On the bright side, I never saw Firefox lagging hardcore in my testing - in
fact, as
Has anyone reached out directly to the guys running the benchmark to
try and get a feel for what their motivations are here? They may
actually be willing to do the work necessary to make this a good
benchmark.
I spent an hour or two going over some of their tests and making
suggestions on their
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Kevin Gadd kevin.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone reached out directly to the guys running the benchmark to
try and get a feel for what their motivations are here? They may
actually be willing to do the work necessary to make this a good
benchmark.
Justin
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Daniel Buchner dbuch...@mozilla.com wrote:
I know the principal Google PM, Alex K, who heads up RoboHornet - he has
been extremely helpful with our Web Components initiative. I believe he had
good intentions with RoboHornet, and his personal posts (and those of
15 matches
Mail list logo
