On 11/02/2012 01:47 AM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
First, I want to try to pour some gasoline on the dying embers and
suggest that perhaps we should totally rearrange everything. As a
developer user of our testing systems, I always found it incredibly
irritating that there were test directories
On 11/1/2012 9:19 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
(a) How about building Windows with a newer version of MSVC, say 2012? (What
version are we using now, anyway? The build instructions page says 2010 is
official, but a tbpl log showed Visual Studio 9.0 on the path.) Maybe they
have fixed bugs in
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Gavin Sharp ga...@gavinsharp.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
Not if the pref isn't set. If the pref is set I suspect it still returns
an object with the relevant properties, but that object is no longer a
On 2012-11-01 8:47 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
|-- tests/
|-- browser-chrome/
|-- topic1 (omit this level if there would be only one)
|-- topic2
|-- [...]
|-- chrome/
|-- crashtests/
|-- marionette/
|--
On 11/2/12 4:42 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Gavin Sharp ga...@gavinsharp.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
Not if the pref isn't set. If the pref is set I suspect it still returns
an object with the relevant properties,
Right - the linked modules are not jetpack-only code - they're part of
core gecko code now, and the plan is to land even more of them, so
we need to keep them working somehow.
Gavin
On 2012-11-02, at 9:33 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller dtel...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 11/2/12 4:42 PM, Kyle Huey
Hi all,
The building where the machine hosting the git mirror updater is located is
going under a power maintenance tomorrow, Nov 3, from 8am - 4pm eastern
time. Therefore, the git mirror may not get updated in that period. Once
the power comes back up, the service should resume.
Apologies in
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:26:34 AM UTC-7, Henrik Skupin wrote:
As nearly all of you agreed on a flat folder structure makes a lot of
sense if only one type of test is present. I second that, and we
shouldn't make use of a 'tests' subfolder in such a case. But it would
be fantastic if we
On 11/2/12 1:08 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
On 11/02/2012 01:47 AM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
First, I want to try to pour some gasoline on the dying embers and
suggest that perhaps we should totally rearrange everything. As a
developer user of our testing systems, I always found it incredibly
irritating that
I see an increasing number of patches using anonymous namespaces instead
of 'static'. This is debugger unfriendly: setting a breakpoint in gdb
for 'foo' in an anonymous namespace requires the following syntax:
b (anonymous namespace)::foo
(If there's a less verbose way of doing this,
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jason Duell jduell.mcb...@gmail.com wrote:
I see an increasing number of patches using anonymous namespaces instead of
'static'. This is debugger unfriendly
It also obfuscates the visibility of the identifier, because the
|namespace {| is often far from the
Hello,
The Graphics meeting will take place this Monday at 2:30 PM US/Pacific
time. That could be Tuesday in your timezone.
Please first add your agenda items there:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX/2012-November-5
* Not every Monday at 2:30 PM Pacific Time
* +1 650 903 0800 x92 Conf#
12 matches
Mail list logo
