Re: Platform meeting changes effective June 2013

2013-05-29 Thread Anthony Jones
On 30/05/13 04:55, Mike Hommey wrote: > As someone that will soon be in UTC+9, and taking on the occasion to > represent all the people in that timezone and surroundings, a couple > hours before 3am is not very a great time to decide whether I'd attend > or not. That being said, I haven't attended

Re: Tree Closure for infrastructure work, Saturday June 1 from 1400 PDT to 2000 PDT

2013-05-29 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2013-05-29 19:00 -0700, Hal Wine wrote: > All trees will be closed during this period. Jobs in progress at start > of treeclosure will likely burn, and can be retrigged afterwards if needed. Given that people are supposed to watch many trees (e.g., mozilla-central, mozilla-aurora, moz

Re: Tree Closure for infrastructure work, Saturday June 1 from 1400 PDT to 2000 PDT

2013-05-29 Thread Kyle Huey
Is this happening on Saturday or Sunday? The email says both ... - Kyle On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Hal Wine wrote: > Hi. > > As noted below, we will have a tree closing maintenance window this > coming Saturday. The times given below include the time to bring the > trees back online. Mo

Re: Proposal to make Firefox open in the foreground on Mac when launched from terminal

2013-05-29 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2013-05-29 6:45 PM, André Reinald wrote: I think the default behavior should stay as it is. But I suggest having the mach script read a setting (from mozconfig or elsewhere) to decide which way to launch Firefox. This should satisfy all developers. If we decide that foreground should be the

Re: Proposal to make Firefox open in the foreground on Mac when launched from terminal

2013-05-29 Thread Nick Alexander
So I'd like to ask, if you care about this, which way would _you_ have as the default? I want |mach run| to start the application in the foreground. Nick ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/

Re: Proposal to make Firefox open in the foreground on Mac when launched from terminal

2013-05-29 Thread André Reinald
I think the default behavior should stay as it is. But I suggest having the mach script read a setting (from mozconfig or elsewhere) to decide which way to launch Firefox. This should satisfy all developers. André Le 30/05/13 00:16, Till Schneidereit a écrit : Oh yes, please, a thousand times

Re: Proposal to make Firefox open in the foreground on Mac when launched from terminal

2013-05-29 Thread Till Schneidereit
Oh yes, please, a thousand times yes! On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > Typically when you use the terminal to open an application on Mac, the > application is opened in the background. This means that for example when > you use mach run or mach debug, you need to either

Proposal to make Firefox open in the foreground on Mac when launched from terminal

2013-05-29 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Typically when you use the terminal to open an application on Mac, the application is opened in the background. This means that for example when you use mach run or mach debug, you need to either use the mouse or a painful sequence of keyboard shortcuts in order to get to the Firefox window that i

Re: Code Review Session

2013-05-29 Thread Benoit Girard
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Anthony Jones wrote: > A pre-upload check would give the fastest feedback. I'll be checking in a script in the mozilla repo that can be ran offline and produce the same results. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: > On 2013-05-27 10:54 PM, Antho

Re: Extending the text-overflow/overflow property to support fading out

2013-05-29 Thread Jared Wein
- Original Message - > From: "Jared Wein" > To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:58:34 PM > Subject: Re: Extending the text-overflow/overflow property to support fading > out > > - Original Message - > > From: "Robert O'Callahan" > > To: "Jonathan

Re: Platform meeting changes effective June 2013

2013-05-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:29:46PM -0700, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > I would also prefer an agenda that is set before the meeting and need > to discuss this with those who will be contributing to the agenda. I > think a day in advance might be pushing it given when I see most > Mozilla meeting agenda