Re: Detection of unlabeled UTF-8

2013-09-11 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Adam Roach a écrit : when you look at that document, tell me what you think the parenthetical phrase after the author's name is supposed to look like -- because I can guarantee that Firefox isn't doing the right thing here. In my case it does and displays : Хизер Фланаган I have the universal

Re: Introducing Brotli - an alternative to LZMA

2013-09-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:49:58AM +0100, Jonathan Kew wrote: However, several concerns regarding LZMA (lack of formal specification combined with complexity of the code, making careful security review and maintenance difficult; relatively slow decompression) Another problem with LZMA is the

Re: Introducing Brotli - an alternative to LZMA

2013-09-11 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
On 2013-09-11, at 5:55 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:49:58AM +0100, Jonathan Kew wrote: However, several concerns regarding LZMA (lack of formal specification combined with complexity of the code, making careful security review and maintenance difficult; relatively slow

Re: Introducing Brotli - an alternative to LZMA

2013-09-11 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 11/9/13 14:12, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: Brotli increases the window size and thus memory requirement to 4MB which is quite a bit. It's also larger than the cache size on mobile devices which is currently around 1MB so it would be interesting to see decompression speeds on small cache devices.

Re: Introducing Brotli - an alternative to LZMA

2013-09-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:12:53AM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: On 2013-09-11, at 5:55 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:49:58AM +0100, Jonathan Kew wrote: However, several concerns regarding LZMA (lack of formal specification combined with complexity of the code, making

Re: Introducing Brotli - an alternative to LZMA

2013-09-11 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
On 2013-09-11, at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: On 11/9/13 14:12, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: Brotli increases the window size and thus memory requirement to 4MB which is quite a bit. It's also larger than the cache size on mobile devices which is currently around 1MB so it would be interesting

New Promise Constructor

2013-09-11 Thread Andrea Marchesini
Hi all, I just want to inform that I'm landing a patch that changes the DOM Promise constructor. DOM Promise is disabled by pref but I know that there are a few existing pieces of code that already use them. The old constructor was based the PromiseResolver object. Now we get rid of this

Re: JavaScript Style Guide. Emacs mode line.

2013-09-11 Thread Scott Johnson
Thus Spoke ishikawa: On (2013年09月10日 00:08), Scott Johnson wrote: Thus Spoke ishikawa: So you are suggesting something like step 1 - request for formatting a file indented in an arcane format, i.e., reformat it according to the currently adopted code. Exactly what I meant, if by request for

Re: New Promise Constructor

2013-09-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/11/13 2:13 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: callback PromiseInit = void (object resolve, object reject); [Constructor(PromiseInit init)] interface Promise {...} What members does PromiseInit dictionary have? ^_^ It's not a dictionary. It's a callback, like the IDL snippet above says. So

Re: New Promise Constructor

2013-09-11 Thread Marcos Caceres
On 11/09/2013, at 6:11 PM, Andrea Marchesini amarches...@mozilla.com wrote: Hi all, I just want to inform that I'm landing a patch that changes the DOM Promise constructor. DOM Promise is disabled by pref but I know that there are a few existing pieces of code that already use them.

Re: New Promise Constructor

2013-09-11 Thread Marcos Caceres
On 11/09/2013, at 8:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 9/11/13 2:13 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: callback PromiseInit = void (object resolve, object reject); [Constructor(PromiseInit init)] interface Promise {...} What members does PromiseInit dictionary have? ^_^ It's not a

Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
Earlier today the backlog on Android build jobs was on the order of 1300. It seems to be coming down a little now but for a while there I was worried it was going to grow unboundedly. Try jobs from over 10 hours ago still have pending jobs - as I'm sure you all know, having a 10-hour

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread Jim Chen
Do we know why it's that much backed up? I started noticing it yesterday. Is it because of lots of inbound pushes? lots of try pushes? Lots of clobbering? Lots of tests? Jim On 9/11/13 5:31 PM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: Earlier today the backlog on Android build jobs was on the order of 1300. It

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread jmaher
quite possibly we don't need all those jobs running on tegras. I don't know of a bug in the product that has broken on either the tegra or panda platform but not the other. Joel ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:39:37PM -0700, jmaher wrote: quite possibly we don't need all those jobs running on tegras. I don't know of a bug in the product that has broken on either the tegra or panda platform but not the other. Off the top of my head: - I have broken one but not the other

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread Jim Mathies
Fixing bugs like bug 884972 would probably help quite a bit. Also posting patches with checkin info and marking the bug with checkin-needed so the work lands with other patches. I always try to do this with simple front end patches. Jim Kartikaya Gupta kgu...@mozilla.com wrote in message

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread Benoit Jacob
2013/9/11 Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:39:37PM -0700, jmaher wrote: quite possibly we don't need all those jobs running on tegras. I don't know of a bug in the product that has broken on either the tegra or panda platform but not the other. Off the top of my

Re: Tegra build backlog is too big!

2013-09-11 Thread John O'Duinn
hi kats (cross-posting to dev-b2g); tl:dr; we think all is ok again, details below. To avoid this happening again this week, we're changing tryserver to reduce the number of Android-tests-run-on-tegra-by-default. If you specifically want tegra testing on tryserver, you will need to state that