On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Matt Brubeck mbrub...@mozilla.com wrote:
One alternative is a Firefox extension.
Compared to cross-browser NPAPI plug-ins, it seems worse to have
browser-specific extensions that expose functionality to Web content.
We've also mentioned the possibility of
Hi.
My two cents.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
On 11/8/2013 4:33 AM, fma spew wrote:
We have a npapi-npruntime plug-in that access the Windows certificate
store
via CAPI to provide the end-user with its personal certificates to perform
*** The problem
We are currently faced with a problem on facebook.com (see bug 934935)
that brings Firefox to its knees because our session restore accumulates
huge amounts of dead data. This problem is most likely a Facebook bug,
and we are in touch with the Facebook team to see if they can
Over the past few weeks, we've been working on Metro and Desktop shared
profiles.
You can find some background information about this work on my blog [here][1].
Within the next week, if QA gives us the OK, well, we'll be uplifting the Metro
and Desktop shared profile work from the oak branch to
I don't know much about sessionstore.js, but I imagine that the issues it
faces are similar to those of navigation and session history, which I've
been involved with recently from the servo and spec angles.
Restoring dynamically generated iframes is undecidable. This doesn't stop
Gecko from
Perhaps we could take a nuanced version of this option...
Or we could not save dynamic iframes that are not visible.
…changing it to ‘Put a reasonable cap on the amount of history we store for
invisible, dynamic iframes, using a fifo queue’?
Mike.
On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:09 PM, David
e.g. the first Fx24 esr update was 24.1.0, the next one is 24.1.1
what circumstances call for one vs. the other
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 11/13/2013 3:11 PM, al...@yahoo.com wrote:
e.g. the first Fx24 esr update was 24.1.0, the next one is 24.1.1
what circumstances call for one vs. the other
We are spinning a Firefox 25.0.1 build to fix some important
regressions. So:
25 == 24.1.0ESR
25.0.1 == 24.1.1ESR
26 == 24.2ESR
Hello everyone,
I'm working on automated tests for Gecko's camera code on B2G, and I
want to replace different pieces of the implementation with fake objects
that return one or more injected error codes so that I can exercise all
of the error-handling paths.
None of this code needs to be
I think providing a non-public API to modify the run-time behavior of
code, using gtest's FRIEND_TEST macro to give tests the ability to
modify private class members, or using Google's googlemock C++ mocking
framework are all better than littering #ifdefs like this throughout the
code.
On 11/12/2013 03:39 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Sutherland
asutherl...@asutherland.org wrote:
On 11/11/2013 01:33 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
Actually, I believe you need to keep the x-imap4-modified-utf7 converters
in B2G, if you don't want to break Gaia
When you say iframes you mean content documents that aren't toplevel
content documents, right?
Can you explain why sessionstore.js needs to observe non-toplevel-content
documents at all? I assume there's an obvious answer, I just don't know
what it is :-).
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy
On 11/13/13 10:27 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
When you say iframes you mean content documents that aren't toplevel
content documents, right?
Indeed.
Can you explain why sessionstore.js needs to observe
non-toplevel-content documents at all? I assume there's an obvious
answer, I just don't
We could do that.
This might make the behavior of Firefox a little harder to predict for
web devs, though.
Cheers,
David
On 11/13/13 7:38 PM, Mike de Boer wrote:
Perhaps we could take a nuanced version of this option...
Or we could not save dynamic iframes that are not visible.
…changing
On 11/13/13 3:34 PM, Mike Habicher wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on automated tests for Gecko's camera code on B2G, and I
want to replace different pieces of the implementation with fake
objects that return one or more injected error codes so that I can
exercise all of the
David Rajchenbach-Teller schrieb:
Or we could not save dynamic iframes that are not visible.
It sounds to me personally like this would be the most sensible option.
Do we know what, if anything, would break with this on the real web? Do
we have any e.g. telemetry data for how often those are
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:09 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
dtel...@mozilla.com wrote:
Or we could not save dynamic iframes in non-current positions in the
history.
Does this mean that currently, if a page creates an IFRAME, loads url A
into it, then loads url B into it, sessionstore.js will
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Does this mean that currently, if a page creates an IFRAME, loads url A
into it, then loads url B into it, sessionstore.js will contain state for
both A and B?
That does seem excessive.
Yeah. If we _do_ decide to
(2013/11/14 9:18), Ted Mielczarek wrote:
On 11/13/13 3:34 PM, Mike Habicher wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on automated tests for Gecko's camera code on B2G, and I
want to replace different pieces of the implementation with fake
objects that return one or more injected error codes so that
19 matches
Mail list logo
