Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Geolocation Working Group

2014-02-25 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2014-02-24 23:57 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Geolocation Working Group http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0002.html http://www.w3.org/2014/02/geo-charter.html deadline for comments: March 15 I don't

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Kyle Machulis
In valgrind on FxOS devices (right now only nexus 4/5), we run checks against IPC. Unfortunately there's no automation there at the moment. We've got a goal to get IPC turned on for b2g desktop ASAP though, at which point we might be able to look at that. - Original Message - From:

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2/24/2014, 10:08 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: Nick, do we run any kind of automated leak checking through valgrind? I found bug 976363 today, it's something that any automated leak detection tool should be able

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: The Valgrind test job does leak checking, and it's recently caught some leaks and caused the offending patches to be backed out. However, the test coverage is pretty meagre, and it's desktop only so can't detect

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-02-25, 3:53 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: The Valgrind test job does leak checking, and it's recently caught some leaks and caused the offending patches to be backed out. However, the test coverage is

Re: New Content Policy API

2014-02-25 Thread ywlam8212
Jonas Sicking於 2011年9月17日星期六UTC+8上午5時14分51秒寫道: Hi All, We had a impromptu meeting today discussing what a new Content Policy API would look like. We have for a long time been suffering from an API which provides very little convenience for code needing to do security checks before opening a

Re: Use of MOZ_ARRAY_LENGTH for static constants?

2014-02-25 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-02-24, 1:25 PM, Chris Peterson wrote: On 2/23/14, 4:05 PM, Neil wrote: Both ArrayLength and MOZ_ARRAY_LENGTH are typesafe when compiled as C++, however ArrayLength has the disadvantage that it's not a constant expression in MSVC. In unoptimised builds this is direly slow as the

PSA: Upcoming changes to mozilla::RefCounted and mozilla::SupportsWeakPtr

2014-02-25 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Over in bug 935778, I'm making RefCounted opt into the leak detection facilities of XPCOM. This means that soon you will have to consider the following before using RefCounted: 1. You should make sure that the consumers of your code either all live in libxul or they all live outside of it.

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: How much slower is a valgrind run of let's say mochitest-1 on a test slave? I don't think that we can run many interesting tests on valgrind on the build machine (and the PGO test set is *really* old and doesn't

Re: We live in a memory-constrained world

2014-02-25 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: I never understood why we need those jobs to be builds. Why not turn --enable-valgrind on m-c builds, and run valgrind as a test job? --disable-jemalloc is needed as well. As for the structure... I just took what already

support for Visual Studio 2010

2014-02-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
When do we plan to drop support for Visual Studio 2010? I remember at one point that it was not possible to generate builds that ran on Windows XP with VS2010, but Update 1 (released in November) added support for that. ___ dev-platform mailing list

Re: support for Visual Studio 2010

2014-02-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack wrote: When do we plan to drop support for Visual Studio 2010? I remember at one point that it was not possible to generate builds that ran on Windows XP with VS2010, but Update 1 (released in November) added support for that. Not possible to generate builds that ran on