I've been thinking a bit about writing a JSM for validating arguments coming
into a function.
The first part would be the set of assertion functions:
* a non-empty string
* a whole number
* a positive number
* a non-negative number
* a function
* instanceof
* typeof
* member
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2014-05-13, 9:01 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
...
The problem is that the API doesn't really make it obvious that
you're not supposed to take the value that the getter returns and
just spawn N workers.
I remember opening a bug for this ~2.5 years ago. The answer was that
most of these assertions are so trivial to write that putting them in a
module would actually make reading the code harder than simpler. I don't
think the situation has changed since then.
Cheers,
David
On 15/05/14 08:04,
I agree with what David said; it usually makes the code harder to read, but
that also greatly depends on the exposed API of the library.
Assertions are a widely-known, commonly accepted way to do in-method validation.
I quite recently wrote Assert.jsm
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Brian Nicholson bnichol...@mozilla.com wrote:
If we disagree with this proposal:
What alternatives do we have? Given that countries require more than
two administrative levels in postal address, it seems our options are
limited. We can't simply provide a
Hi,
This is my first post in this forum so please let me know if anything is wrong.
I have been working on a desktop application named AZARDI which is based on
xulrunner. It is an offline ePub Reader for all three major platforms (Windows,
Mac, Linux). You can check it out at
On 14-05-15 08:46 AM, Manish wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post in this forum so please let me know if anything is
wrong.
I have been working on a desktop application named AZARDI which is based on
xulrunner. It is an offline ePub Reader for all three major platforms
(Windows, Mac,
On May 15, 2014, at 9:29, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Brian Nicholson bnichol...@mozilla.com
wrote:
If we disagree with this proposal:
What alternatives do we have? Given that countries require more than
two administrative levels in postal
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Reuben Morais reuben.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
The en-US locale (and every other locale) would need to have English
translations for European countries’ administrative level names.
Yes. Not being able to use this feature with a credit card from
Switzerland and an
Re: readability, that's something to think about, but when I write code like
this:
if ((typeof num != number) ||
(Math.floor(num) != num) ||
isNaN(num) ||
(num 0) ||
Math.abs(num) == Infinity) {
throw new Error(This need to be a non-negative whole
On 05/15/2014 05:58 PM, ajvinc...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: readability, that's something to think about, but when I write code like
this:
if ((typeof num != number) ||
(Math.floor(num) != num) ||
isNaN(num) ||
(num 0) ||
Math.abs(num) == Infinity) {
On May 15, 2014, at 1:26 AM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
...
Make it possible for authors to make a semi-informed decision on how to
divide the work among workers.
That can already be done
That error is due to not having an update manifest in the mar and implies
that the update mar wasn't generated with a manifest.
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/updat
er/updater.cpp#3700
Robert
-Original Message-
From: dev-platform
Thanks to a few hours of debugging by glandium Tuesday night, a tweak
has been made which may address the multi-hour delays we had been
seeing. (As of now, we've seen one successful push that took ~38 min of
CPU and wall clock time to complete.)
With that in place, the current plans are:
a)
Original Message
Subject:[Planned Maintenance Notification] Tree closing maintenance
window
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 21:28:41 -
From: notificati...@mozilla.com
To: every...@mozilla.org
Short Summary:
Mozilla IT will have a tree closing maintenance window
On 5/15/14, 8:21 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2014-05-15, 5:29 AM, Anne
van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Brian Nicholson
bnichol...@mozilla.com wrote:
If we disagree with this proposal:
What alternatives do we have? Given that countries require more than
two
16 matches
Mail list logo
