Re: Intent to implement: WebMIDI

2014-06-19 Thread Ralph Giles
On 2014-06-14 1:11 PM, Kyle Machulis wrote: Preference behind which this will be implemented: dom.webmidi.enabled I suggest dom.midi.enabled. 'web' is redundant with dom, and doesn't appear as a prefix in any of the API points. -r ___ dev-platform

Mentors now have their own Bugzilla field.

2014-06-19 Thread Mike Hoye
Hi, everyone - We've just wrapped up big migration of the mentored bug information in Bugzilla from [mentor=person] in the whiteboard to bug mentors being their own field. Most of that change was done automatically and silently, for which we can thank glob, dkl and their usual

Re: C++ standards proposals of potential interest, and upcoming committee meeting

2014-06-19 Thread Botond Ballo
- Original Message - From: Joshua Cranmer  pidgeo...@gmail.com Perhaps a bit late to be saying this, but after reading this paper, I've come to object to it. Appreciate the feedback. I have some clarification questions to help me understand your objections better. It explicitly

Re: Is it time for mochitest-chrome on Android and B2G

2014-06-19 Thread Mark Finkle
Fennec/Android does have the ability to run xpcshell-like tests. These tests are JS scripts loaded into a framework that simulates the xpcshell system. Technically it's not xpcshell though. The JS script is loaded into tab of the Fennec browser. If the JS script knows this, it can create a

Guidelines for naming preferences?

2014-06-19 Thread Masayuki Nakano
Hi, folks. I'm looking for guidelines for naming preferences. However, I've never found it yet. I guess that there is no guidelines. If so, I'd like somebody to create a common guidelines in MDN. When I work on some bugs, I need to add a new option for a pref switchable behavior, e.g., if

Re: C++ standards proposals of potential interest, and upcoming committee meeting

2014-06-19 Thread Joshua Cranmer 
On 6/19/2014 5:55 PM, Botond Ballo wrote: Are you saying that gcc - assuming that for some platforms, it is considered the platform vendor, and therefore the provider of std::abi - would likely ship their non-conforming std::string as std::abi::string in order to maintain ABI compatibility