hi Tobias, Bugzilla has many fields and teams use them in many different
ways. :) It's usually best to let the people reporting or investigating
the bugs update the bug fields.
From my experience, many (most?) teams never change a bug's Status
from NEW to ASSIGNED, but they still use Assigned
On 09.07.2014 01:41, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-07-08, 6:34 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2014-07-07 15:18 -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
That seems pretty bad. I think we should at least stop supporting
it for Web content. David, what do you think?
I'm ok with restricting it to UA
Interesting point. What's the profile of users who write comments on
crash reports? Would they click on a button add comments?
On 08/07/14 21:33, Honza Bambas wrote:
This would probably eliminate most comments we get on crash reports.
Even if a good number of those are not helpful now, a
On 7/9/2014 2:47 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
Despite its name, the Target Milestone field is usually left unset
until *after* the bug is fixed. Then Target Milestone is set to the
version of Firefox Nightly that was fixed (e.g. Nightly 33 is
mozilla33). Even if a bug fix is uplifted from Nightly
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 03:51:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias B. Besemer:
I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target
Milestone to a Milestone that get still developed ...
I did this:
On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 03:51:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias B. Besemer:
I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target
Milestone to a Milestone that get still developed ...
I did this:
What’s the purpose of the “ASSIGNED status? If we’re saying that this status
can be computed from Assigned To field (being set to nobody or something else),
then why do we still have it? If it isn’t equivalent, then we may be losing
some information if we reset it back to New.
--
- Milan
On
As glob noted upthread, the NEW/ASSIGNED distinction is sometimes used
by people when they are the assignee. There is only a lack of difference
when the assignee is nob...@mozilla.org. That doesn't warrant
abolishing the status (although we could arguably ask bmo folks to make
the reset the
Hey all,
here’s an illustrative video of the last option that David mentioned.
http://cl.ly/2E0q3W3Y2S3h
Note in particular, that the restoring of the background windows is not
animated.
— Philipp
On 07 Jul 2014, at 06:43, David Rajchenbach-Teller dtel...@mozilla.com wrote:
(Cc-ing
Most probably would not type a comment when they're not immediately
prompted for it. We could do an experiment around it, but I'd be
surprised if anything else comes out of it.
I for myself probably wouldn't type a comment myself in 90% of the
cases when that was required, and I know how
On 7/9/2014 4:46 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Most probably would not type a comment when they're not immediately
prompted for it. We could do an experiment around it, but I'd be
surprised if anything else comes out of it.
There's no reason to guess or use personal anecdotes for this. We'll do
Hi!
I was interested to test the new TB 31 Beta ...
... I'm now using 24.6.0 ...
... so I installed the extension Update Channel Selector 1.6 and switched to
beta ...
When I now open the About I see that I be on beta, but TB says:
Thunderbird is up to date (I think there is a point at the end
That is an unsupported way to use beta. Please use the download links below.
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/beta/all/
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/all-beta.html
On Jul 9, 2014 5:10 PM, Tobias B. Besemer tobias.bese...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I was interested to test the
In the moz.build files, there is specified XPCSHELL_TESTS_MANIFESTS,
but I can not found where to processing this variable/files in mozbuild system.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
I've recently been using gtest for media code. However I've come across
the issue of fopen() working locally but not on the try servers.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Tryrev=11d9f94c54bd
Any suggestions on how I should do this differently?
Anthony
On 7/9/14, 8:21 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote:
In the moz.build files, there is specified XPCSHELL_TESTS_MANIFESTS,
but I can not found where to processing this variable/files in mozbuild system.
See the following:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Dale Harvey wrote:
Application developers have the ability to specify additional menuitems for
contextmenus via
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Wesley Hardman whardma...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppressing the contextmenu is extremely user-hostile (for some users).
There is a reason I always run with dom.event.contextmenu.enabled set to
false.
This option would continue to work and make us ignore the
18 matches
Mail list logo
