Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

It seems the two hours are up, but I wanted to ask a question anyway. On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:53 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > I'm still considering between two different endings: > > ... Note that they are already actively ignoring the WHATWG. > = > > One of the major

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> On 09/10/2015 06:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> > If I am the only one that wants to put in a formal objection here, >> > then I'll let it go and go with whatever everyone else think we >> > should do. >> > >> >>

Re: On the future of and application/x-x509-*-cert MIME handling

Awesome, thanks Ryan. This cements my opinion on their fate. These are not just old and crufty, they are actively harmful. They can't be removed soon enough. I'm not fundamentally opposed to the notion of having some sort of site control of client authentication in general, and maybe even TLS

Re: On the future of and application/x-x509-*-cert MIME handling

I have some questions, to which I was unable to find answers for in the (numerous and long) threads on this subject. 1. When we download and install a client cert, what checking do we do? Do we insist upon it meeting the same algorithm requirements we have for servers with respect to use of

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

On 09/11/2015 04:53 AM, L. David Baron wrote: On Tuesday 2015-09-08 17:33 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: Follow-up on this, since we now have two days remaining to respond to these proposed charters. If you still have strong opinions about the proposed Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

Re: Intent to ship: RC4 disabled by default in Firefox 44

Hearing no objections, let's consider this the plan of record. Thanks, --Richard On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > For a while now, we have been progressively disabling the known-insecure > RC4 cipher [0]. The security team has been discussing with

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

On Friday 2015-09-11 09:43 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > It seems the two hours are up, but I wanted to ask a question anyway. > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:53 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > > I'm still considering between two different endings: > > > > ... > > Note that

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

On Friday 2015-09-11 00:46 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote: > The HTML WG has historically has contained so much noise that next to > all productive contributors has left the group, leading to the being > unable to create almost any useful contributions to HTML5. This has > been such a big problem that