Re: GTests are now running on test machines

2016-01-13 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
> Are C++ units tests that don't use GTest still run as part of the build job? Chris told me that non-GTest C++ unit tests run in the "Cpp" job, and that one-off test programs in make check targets will continue to run as part of the build job. Nick ___

Re: GTests are now running on test machines

2016-01-13 Thread Xidorn Quan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Christopher Manchester wrote: > GTests are now run from their own job on Treeherder instead of during the > build in "make check'. They can be found under the "GTest" symbol on > treeherder on all integration branches, and can be added to try pushes with > "-u gte

Re: Feedback needed on proposal to add a web primitive for queuing microtasks

2016-01-13 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
I think this makes sense. On 2016-01-13 4:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512 Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up! I've already noted a possible concern about abuse,

GTests are now running on test machines

2016-01-13 Thread Christopher Manchester
GTests are now run from their own job on Treeherder instead of during the build in "make check'. They can be found under the "GTest" symbol on treeherder on all integration branches, and can be added to try pushes with "-u gtest" (they will run with "-u all"). As an effect of this change we're now

Re: Feedback needed on proposal to add a web primitive for queuing microtasks

2016-01-13 Thread Jonas Sicking
Sounds good to me as well. As long as it's very clearly defined that this doesn't return to the event loop and so UI events, timers, network events, etc MUST NOT be processed between the tasks under any circumstances. I.e. something like: function spinner() { window.enqueueMicrotask(spinner) } s

Re: Feedback needed on proposal to add a web primitive for queuing microtasks

2016-01-13 Thread Kyle Huey
In principle, I don't see any reason not to do this. - Kyle On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512 > > Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic > idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up!

Feedback needed on proposal to add a web primitive for queuing microtasks

2016-01-13 Thread Boris Zbarsky
Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512 Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up! I've already noted a possible concern about abuse, but Promise and MutationObserver kinda allow that already; it just t

Re: Spec workshop: Grid Layout

2016-01-13 Thread Patrick Brosset
The flex-workshop URL is 404, I think you meant this one instead: http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/events/flexbox-workshop On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:01 AM, fantasai wrote: > I've started doing a series of workshops inviting web authors > to get together and do an in-depth study of some of t