On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
>> When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and
>> instead want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused
>> because a commit is a changeset (in Mercu
If xvfb doesn't work for you then as far as I know there's no way for it to
be truly headless unfortunately. Looks like slimerjs is trying to to solve
this issue:
https://github.com/laurentj/slimerjs/issues/80
They mention using createWindowlessBrowser but I'm not familiar with it.
On Thu, Apr 7,
If the problem is that you're running on a windowless system, you can use
xfvb-run to launch your application
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Devan Shah wrote:
> slimerjs is not fully headless unless using xvfb, is there anything else
> that can he used.
> __
slimerjs is not fully headless unless using xvfb, is there anything else that
can he used.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Check out slimerjs: https://slimerjs.org/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Devan Shah wrote:
> Is it possible to run firefox in headless form to fetch url and get the
> full Dom as rendered. Same way it would render on normal foredox
> ___
> dev-platfor
You might be able to create views into these triage queue's with
combinations of existing keywords and maybe a few added ones. For example:
Can reproduce
Can others reproduce the problem described?
has the inverse represented by needs-testcase for example. In the case of
the bug
Is it possible to run firefox in headless form to fetch url and get the full
Dom as rendered. Same way it would render on normal foredox
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
First: there's that Bugzilla Anthropology project (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla_Anthropology) thanks. I'd heard mention
of it and asked around.
What we found during the pilot, and the Platform Team has found in their
triage, is that list of bugs with needinfo? is
I'm worried that multiple q
Thanks for the info, Mark.
In the mean time, at least, it would make interdiffs easiest to
read if patch authors can submit updates to patches against the
same revision as the original patches.
If that causes too much inconvenience (and it will sometimes),
then separate pushes for the rebase and
MozReview, specifically, Review Board, has a number of bugs related to
interdiffs[1]. Many of these bugs are related to Review Board's
algorithms to filter out changes caused by rebases (as opposed to
intentional updates to commits). Both the MozReview and the Review Board
teams have done some inve
re: Determining answers to any or all of the above might require
multiple rounds of dialog, and some of them need to be understood in
sequence rather than in parallel. They also require very different
sets of expertise to determine.
Yes! We should set up systems and process and sk
Hello dev-platform and firefox-dev,
We are delaying the release of Firefox 46 for a week.
Short version: For the Firefox 46 cycle, merge day is now April 25. Release
is April 26. The 47 release schedule hasn't changed; release still
planned for June 7.
Here are some details:
During the 46 b
We are going to revert this change for now to unblock our release process,
since it is clear that some changes need to be made, and I will be out all
of next week.
Now is the time to make comments about how that feature should behave! :)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803779
On Thu
Sorry, that "look at the signatures" link should have been
https://crash-stats.allizom.org/search/?product=Firefox&signature=%5EAbort&_facets=signature&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=abort_message#facet-signature
I propose that before we add it to the signature, we remove /^\[.+\]
##
For one thing, the signature facet is more helpful to look at
signatures:
Abort&_facets=signature&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=abort_message#facet-signature
;-)
Hmm, I'm somewhat nervous about the fact that there is no signature that
appears twice in this stage dataset. I think t
15 matches
Mail list logo