On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 2:41:58 AM UTC+8, Bobby Holley wrote:
> Binary components are no longer supported:
> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/04/dropping-support-for-binary-components/
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if binary components still work in Firefox 45 ESR. I
> >
On 2016/04/12 20:27, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote:
So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central? What
the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central?
My understanding is that
On 12/04/16 17:32, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
for example, http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.1/
Also note that the releases.mozilla.org host supports https, which
offers an additional verification path.
I've long thought that Bugzilla should be more like Wikipedia: the
"front page" of the bug is editable and always up-to-date (i.e. not
incorrect or outdated STRs), but the history and meta discussion is
still available on a "back page".
On 4/12/16 2:19 PM, David Lawrence wrote:
I used to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Bobby Holley
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Jeff Gilbert
> wrote:
> >> I think the whole attempt is
> >> increasingly a
This is probably a field that could stand to be re-labled, as I was
blithely thinking (and I would guess others are) that it was for features,
only.
-- Emma
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Mark Côté wrote:
> On 2016-04-07 2:50 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > (I'd much rather
Binary components are no longer supported:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/04/dropping-support-for-binary-components/
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if binary components still work in Firefox 45 ESR. I
> have a Firefox
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
> for example, http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.1/
Also note that the releases.mozilla.org host supports https, which
offers an additional verification path.
-r
My apologies. We will need to move this out a week to accommodate the
new Firefox release on April 26th. We do not want our migration to
interrupt the release process so better to do it after.
More time for quality testing and feedback! :)
Thanks
dkl
Forwarded Message
I'm not sure if this is the right list for this, but I thought I'd
better bring this to your attention.
Previous release directories have carried checksum files, with
signatures and a key file that allows the various binary files to be
validated. See, for example,
On 12/04/2016 01:16, Justin Dolske wrote:
Looks like Gijs replied in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255526#c21, and the
contributor's last comment for the day was acknowledgment that he'd stop.
Yes. I got another email personally, from which it seems that they
thought the
11 matches
Mail list logo