Re: An analysis of content process memory overhead

2016-04-13 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > > - Heap overhead is significant. Reducing the page-cache size could save a > couple of MiBs. Improvements beyond that are hard. Turning on jemalloc4 > *might* help a bit, but I wouldn't bank on it, and there are other > complicat

Re: Binary components Firefox 45 ESR - TypeError: Components.classes[cid] is undefined

2016-04-13 Thread Bobby Holley
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:26 PM, wrote: > On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 2:41:58 AM UTC+8, Bobby Holley wrote: > > Binary components are no longer supported: > > > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/04/dropping-support-for-binary-components/ > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to know i

Re: Why do we still need to include Qt widget in mozilla-central?

2016-04-13 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: > > > So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central? What the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central? The same question can be asked of widget/uikit/, which I believe is for the old, never-released port to iOS. I wa

Re: Why do we still need to include Qt widget in mozilla-central?

2016-04-13 Thread Jim Blandy
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano > wrote: > > So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central? > What > > the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central? > > My understanding is that > https://git.merproje

Re: Triage Plan for Firefox Components

2016-04-13 Thread Mark Côté
On 2016-04-13 9:34 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 12/04/16 21:01, Mark Côté wrote: >> Meant to reply to this earlier... BMO has a User Story field that sounds >> like it does exactly what you want. It's an editable field that keeps >> history (admittedly not in an easy-to-read way, but that could

Re: Triage Plan for Firefox Components

2016-04-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/04/16 21:01, Mark Côté wrote: > Meant to reply to this earlier... BMO has a User Story field that sounds > like it does exactly what you want. It's an editable field that keeps > history (admittedly not in an easy-to-read way, but that could be > improved). Despite the name of the field, I'