Re: Static analysis for "use-after-move"?

On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 9:49:24 AM UTC+10, Jim Blandy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gerald Squelart wrote: > > > For example, we know how strings behave when moved from* (the original > > becomes empty), and it'd be nice to be able to use that trick when

Re: Static analysis for "use-after-move"?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gerald Squelart wrote: > For example, we know how strings behave when moved from* (the original > becomes empty), and it'd be nice to be able to use that trick when possible > and really needed. > No, we don't know that. The contract of a

Re: ICU proposing to drop support for WinXP (and OS X 10.6)

What are the distributions of memory and flash sizes for the devices people currently run Fennec on? It'll be almost impossible to have a good discussion about Fennec size without those numbers. I seem to remember that is data we felt was okay to collect. On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Boris

Re: Can we remove nsIEntityConverter?

Cross-posting to mozilla.dev.tech.mathml so that this is seen by people who are interested. Please follow-up to mozilla.dev.platform. Henri Sivonen writes: > We ship data tables for converting from Unicode to HTML entities. > These tables obviously take space. (They are not optimized for space

Re: ICU proposing to drop support for WinXP (and OS X 10.6)

On 4/29/16 11:30 AM, sn...@snorp.net wrote: The Fennec team has been very clear about why they oppose inclusion of ICU in bug 1215247. Sort of. There's been a fair amount of moving of goalposts to get from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215247#c14 to

Re: ICU proposing to drop support for WinXP (and OS X 10.6)

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:26 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2016-04-29 10:43 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > I still find it sad that ECMAScript Intl came (as I understand it) > very close to just standardizing on a piece of software (ICU), Looking at the standard, it