On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> > instead of having it sourced from the
> >
> > advertiser's
> >
> > origin, they instead stand
> > up ".publisher.example.com"
> >
> > and
> >
> > point
> >
> >
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> instead of having it sourced from the
>
> advertiser's
>
> origin, they instead stand
> up ".publisher.example.com"
>
> and
>
> point
>
> it at the advertiser's
> IP addresses (via an A record to the advertiser's
>
>
An update to this: I just re-joined the ARIA-WG on Mozilla's behalf.
Marco
2016-06-02 17:47 GMT+02:00 David Bolter :
> Hi Johnathan,
>
> Our lack of direct W3C ARIA involvement recently is mainly due to
> time/resource constraints and we have influence via proxy.
>
> I think ARIA is best scoped
I concur. 1 in every 12 loads require an HTTP auth prompt? Seems very high.
Visual inspection of the probe implementations [1] [2] show no obvious
faults, so I'm not sure what's going on here.
[1]
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/protocol/http/nsHttpChannelAuthProvider.cpp#78
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA
Team last week, *June 13 - June 17* (week 24).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Des
5 matches
Mail list logo