Re: mach and ccache failure?

2016-08-20 Thread Jan Varga
Yes, it worked for me. On 21/08/16 10:30, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2016/08/20 10:03, Jan Varga wrote: I see the same problem on my mac, but I didn't investigate why it's not working anymore. Did ccacge ever work on the Mac to support two directories? (I mean the compilation result in one

Re: mach and ccache failure?

2016-08-20 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/08/20 10:03, Jan Varga wrote: I see the same problem on my mac, but I didn't investigate why it's not working anymore. Did ccacge ever work on the Mac to support two directories? (I mean the compilation result in one object directory could be substituted for the other object

Re: Rust 1.10 (to be) required to build Firefox with --enable-rust

2016-08-20 Thread Philip Chee
On 11/08/2016 06:29, Gregory Szorc wrote: > We'll offer a standalone file that can be executed to install the > development environment. Isn't MozillaBuild "a standalone file that can be executed to install the development environment." Phil (totally unclear of the difference) -- Philip Chee

Re: Rust 1.10 (to be) required to build Firefox with --enable-rust

2016-08-20 Thread Philip Chee
On 11/08/2016 02:13, Gregory Szorc wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Stefan Sitter > wrote: > >> On 10.08.2016 17:28, Gregory Szorc wrote: >> >>> I'll be marking that bug wontfix as soon as I get in front of a >>> computer with my BMO credentials. We plan to have

Re: MXR permanently offline, please transition to DXR

2016-08-20 Thread Philip Chee
On 20/07/2016 22:47, Andreas Tolfsen wrote: > Erik Rose writes: > >> > Simple question: How often is DXR refreshed from, say, >> > mozilla-central. >> >> Every 6 hours. However, if it doesn't build successfully, it doesn't >> update (since DXR uses information exfiltrated from

Re: Intent to make Form Autocomplete popups use richlistbox's instead of trees

2016-08-20 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 19/08/2016 16:25, Mike Conley wrote: Summary says it all. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1296638 for details and rationale. I have a working version of this on my local machine, and will likely put it up for review today or early next week. I probably don't need to tell