Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-28 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or

Re: Why I don't like DXR

2016-09-28 Thread Erik Rose
I second the sentiment: it's clear that DXR needs a real manual. I've got the start of one at https://dxr.readthedocs.io/en/latest/use.html. So if you want to file PRs against https://github.com/mozilla/dxr/blob/master/docs/source/use.rst, we can grow that into a proper manual, import it into

Re: So, what's the point of Cu.import, these days?

2016-09-28 Thread Nick Fitzgerald
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:19 AM, David Teller wrote: > > * CommonJS > ​Just a heads up: the devtools have been using CommonJS modules and lazily requiring modules for a couple years now. If you don't want to jump directly to ES modules, reusing our infrastructure is

Re: Firefox Engineering TMO Survey

2016-09-28 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
Just a friendly reminder to please consider filling out this survey if you haven't already done so. We've already gotten a lot of great feedback and we'd love to get more! It will be open for responses until Friday the 30th. Thanks! -Ryan On 9/23/2016 3:25 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:

Re: Why I don't like DXR

2016-09-28 Thread Honza Bambas
Thanks everyone for answers. This is helpful, but why don't I see any help like this right on DXR? Why do I have to ask on dev-platform? According identifiers not found on DXR I presume MXR might suffered the same issue, so no blame for DXR here. I was just confused by not being able to

Re: So, what's the point of Cu.import, these days?

2016-09-28 Thread Zibi Braniecki
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 2:01:09 PM UTC-7, David Teller wrote: > "why": because you wrote "The former is a more tricky." in your previous > message. If it's not, I'm quite happy to not remove them :) > > For reference, "the former" is a snippet such as: > > if (needed) { >

Re: So, what's the point of Cu.import, these days?

2016-09-28 Thread David Teller
\o/, let's join forces :) I admit that I haven't thought at all about the impact on exceptions. If we migrate to ES6 modules, then the problem is something that we don't need to handle. If we migrate to CommonJS modules with a loader built into XPConnect, I think that we can solve this without