Re: Announcing MozillaBuild 3.0 Release

2017-07-21 Thread Gregory Szorc
Thanks for all your work on this, Ryan! So everyone knows, this is hopefully the last major overhaul of MozillaBuild. The plan from build system land is to attempt to go "all in" on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). That's the feature in Windows 10 (and even in Server additions now) that

Re: Announcing MozillaBuild 3.0 Release

2017-07-21 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
It appears that the formatting of that email was pretty well destroyed when sent out. Here's a direct link to the release notes in Google Doc form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NDz7ROxTYNB5YnP7VJ5CmJomQDun-7o4HDtSRLkuPaw/edit -Ryan On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen <

Re: Announcing MozillaBuild 3.0 Release

2017-07-21 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
Apologies as well for the awful formatting job there. Thanks Gmail. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Announcing MozillaBuild 3.0 Release

2017-07-21 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
I am pleased to announce the final release of MozillaBuild 3.0! Sorry in advance for the length of this message, but there's a lot of changes in this release worth calling out. https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/libraries/win32/MozillaBuildSetup-Latest.exe

Re: Switching to TaskCluster Windows builds on Wednesday July 26th

2017-07-21 Thread Dustin Mitchell
Nice work -- what a milestone! Dustin ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Switching to TaskCluster Windows builds on Wednesday July 26th

2017-07-21 Thread Justin Wood
Hello, tl;dr What: Windows opt & nightly builds switching to TaskCluster When: Wednesday, July 26th at 11:00ET Developer impact: Much rejoicing, Windows builds ~15 minutes faster, Some Windows 10 testing switched to Tier1. Next Wednesday, July 26th, at 11:00ET we will be switching remaining

Re: Converting const char ()[N] to nsACString

2017-07-21 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 7/21/17 9:44 AM, nmago wrote: Yes, I needed nsACString copy of data to use it as nsACString argument for other function. Assuming "cname" is a char[N] or char*, you should be able to do: nsCString str(cname, N); This will make a copy of the first N bytes of cname and add a

Re: Enabling filesystem read-restrictions for content process sandbox

2017-07-21 Thread Haik Aftandilian
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Andrea Marchesini wrote: > There are some APIs able to read files in the content process using > nsFileInputStream: FileReader is one of them. > The file is opened on the parent process (because of a FilePicker, or > Entries API), the

Re: Enabling filesystem read-restrictions for content process sandbox

2017-07-21 Thread Andrea Marchesini
There are some APIs able to read files in the content process using nsFileInputStream: FileReader is one of them. The file is opened on the parent process (because of a FilePicker, or Entries API), the file descriptor is sent to the content process where the reading happens. Is this supported yet?

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Commerce Interest Group

2017-07-21 Thread Ian Jacobs
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 3:07 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Hi Tantek, > > bcc: Ian Jacobs, who is the W3C Team contact and activity lead. > > On July 18, 2017 at 9:58:40 AM, Tantek Çelik (tan...@cs.stanford.edu) wrote: >> I'd like to hear feedback from Marcos (cc'd) on

Re: Enabling filesystem read-restrictions for content process sandbox

2017-07-21 Thread bowen
As a follow-up to this, tomorrow's (2017-07-22) Nightly will have this enabled for the Windows content process sandbox as well. On Windows this removes access that the User gains via their own SID. So generally things under their home directory (C:\Users\\). With exceptions for the Firefox

Re: Converting const char ()[N] to nsACString

2017-07-21 Thread nmago
воскресенье, 9 июля 2017 г., 4:10:43 UTC+3 пользователь Boris Zbarsky написал: > On 7/5/17 5:41 AM, nmago wrote: > > char* cname = new char[N]; > > memcpy(cname, , N); > > nsACString strName(cname, N, 0); > > This copies the data twice, and leaks it once, as far as I can tell. > > What, exactly,

Re: removing "the old way" of signing add-ons

2017-07-21 Thread Jörg Knobloch
On 20/07/2017 17:34, Kris Maglione wrote: Please see replies elsewhere in this thread. Seamonkey and Thunderbird do use the old signature code that we're talking about removing. Thanks Kris. As you know, TB and SM are maintained mainly by volunteers. We have to interface with all areas of