Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-17 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Steve Fink wrote: > On 9/16/17 6:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: >> >> >> I'd prefer to take a data-driven approach to answering the question of "do >>> we need to

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-17 Thread Steve Fink
On 9/16/17 6:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: I'd prefer to take a data-driven approach to answering the question of "do we need to support vanilla Git." I wish I had local developer metrics or results from a recent developer

Re: Eiminating nsIDOM* interfaces and brand checks

2017-09-17 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov via dev-platform
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:13:55 -0700, Bobby Holley wrote: On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Botond Ballo wrote: On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: How about this slight variation: HTMLEmbedElement.isInstanceOf(obj) instead of "is"? Isn't that backwards, though?

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-17 Thread Marco Bonardo
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > Interesting, please file a bug either way and CC me. It worked > for me back when it first landed, though I haven't tried it since. > I'll see if I can reproduce sometime this week. Done: