Hi,
I'm trying to get rid of nsIPresShell. nsIPresShell.h is anyway included
by mozilla/PresShell.h. So, even if you use only nsIPresShell newly,
please include mozilla/PresShell.h instead.
FYI: Currently, Document::GetPresShell(), nsPresContext::GetPresShell(),
nsPresContext::PresShell(),
Hi, is there an expected date for the cookie change to go to production?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I just landed support for MOZ_DBG for nsIFile (shows the path of the file)
and nsIURI (shows the uri spec) onto inbound.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:04 AM Dave Townsend wrote:
> This sounds excellent. I think on Monday I'll go right to work making this
> work for URIs which are probably the
On 02/04/2019 19:11, Brian Grinstead wrote:
I don't think that having papercuts in the workflow for writing one type of
test is the right way to nudge developers into writing another type. It also
doesn't seem effective - otherwise people would be using the wpt-create tool to
avoid jumping
Le 03/04/2019 à 11:12, Axel Hecht a écrit :
Am 02.04.19 um 19:24 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Because I had a few discussions about task vs enhancement, a good way to
make the difference between the two use cases is: If I ever need help with
this bug, should it come from someone in Product or an
Am 02.04.19 um 19:24 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Because I had a few discussions about task vs enhancement, a good way to
make the difference between the two use cases is: If I ever need help with
this bug, should it come from someone in Product or an EPM?
Can I ask for clarification? Is it
task
6 matches
Mail list logo
