Hi,
Currently, we are in the week#4 of Fx68 release. As I mentioned in my
previous email, feature documentation is due this Friday, April 12th. At
this point, below desktop features are still pending documentation.
Feature Name
Feature Owner
Engineering Team
ETP
Arthur Edelstein
Security
Thanks everyone for your comments.
If we were to run linux32 tests in whole on mozilla-central only that would
result in about half of the load we see from linux32 today and about 1
backfill a week (given that most unique linux32 regressions result in test
disabling). That alone would be a good
I'd like to refocus this thread a bit around Jed's question, because it
gets to the core of the issue.
The proposal argues that test results for linux32 closely track those for
linux64, and that this duplication is expensive. If that's the only
problem, we could solve it by keeping linux32 as a
I had about 5 independent suggestions of "-sp" and I agree that it is much
better than "-fc". But another idea that came out of these conversations
was "1proc" which also ticks all the boxes (only being a tiny bit longer
than "e10s") and being even clearer than "-sp". I think I'll go with that
Hello all,
I just wanted to notify you that since a few weeks ago, our release mgmt
bot has started automatically assigning components to untriaged bugs.
The results look good so far, so we are going to keep it enabled.
The bot is using machine learning to select a component, so it isn't
100%
On 09/04/2019 20:44, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
Yeah, I did consider "non-e10s" for awhile and maybe it is the better
choice. But here are my counter arguments:
1) One of the goals of this change is to de-clutter the treeherder UI.
Using an 8 character symbol suffix runs counter to that goal
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:05 PM Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> On top of that, we know that not all distros have telemetry enabled and
> so we won't be counting those either (Debian is the largest).
We get telemetry from Ubuntu, Fedora, and Arch (subject to choices
made by the user). I'm not
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:13 PM L. David Baron wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2019-04-09 13:55 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron wrote:
> > >
> > > The W3C is proposing revised charters for:
> > >
> > > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group
> > >
8 matches
Mail list logo
