Re: Upcoming C++ standards meeting in Cologne

2019-07-30 Thread Joshua Cranmer 
On 7/30/2019 4:40 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:04:56PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote: On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote: If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on

Proposed W3C Charter: Privacy Interest Group

2019-07-30 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a new charter for: Privacy Interest Group (PING) https://w3cping.github.io/administrivia/charter-draft.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Jun/0009.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Sunday, August 4.

Re: Upcoming C++ standards meeting in Cologne

2019-07-30 Thread Jeff Gilbert
I want to underline how insane this is: "...the groups which looked at [the web_view] proposal [...] largely viewed it favourably, a promising way of allow C++ applications to do things like graphical output without having to standardize a graphics API ourselves, as previously attempted." I feel

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Dear Steve, Thank you for your analysis and suggestion for moving to gcc-8. I would change my local GCC compiler to gcc-8, and g++-8. Also, I would modify the offending code so that the evaluation order of the arguments does not get in the way. I still yet to do a few more tasks, but I think

Re: Upcoming C++ standards meeting in Cologne

2019-07-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:04:56PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote: > > If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last > > week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on > > Planet): > > > >

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Dear Jan, I am glad that I included the snippet of code here. I should have known. I would try to work around this, well I would try, and see if I can avoid the runtime error on tryserver (!). Thanks a million! Chiaki On 2019/07/30 22:20, Jan de Mooij wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51

Re: Upcoming C++ standards meeting in Cologne

2019-07-30 Thread Nathan Froyd
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote: > If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last > week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on > Planet): > >

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread Steve Fink
On 7/30/19 6:20 AM, Jan de Mooij wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: nsresult rv2 = NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream), mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(), <=== It seems this can be nullptr in clang-8 version???

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread Jan de Mooij
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: >nsresult rv2 > = NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream), > mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(), <=== It seems this can be nullptr in > clang-8 version??? > 64 * 1024 );

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread Jörg Knobloch
On 30 Jul 2019 13:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: What is the version of clang used on tryserver? The same as on the local machine? For Windows I get: $ ../.mozbuild/clang/bin/clang --version clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final 356365) Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc Thread model: posix

clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, What is the version of clang used on tryserver? The local clang-8 I have on my linux PC crashes due to internal compiler error during optimization pass, and I want to know what version is used on tryserver. I have been using GCC for compiling TB locally and intend to do so just because