Re: WebIDL Reviewers Group
Hi Nika, this is great. Is there a documented process for setting up and maintaining the alias? On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 1:37 AM Nika Layzell wrote: > As of yesterday, a phabricator reviewers group for WebIDL has been created. > If your patch needs review for WebIDL changes, you can tag this group using > '*r=#webidl*'. > > Once specific DOM peer(s) are working with you on a web standard, you > should continue to reach out to them for reviews as the standard evolves. > > We're testing this out, and hope this will more evenly spread review load > and make it easier to find a peer :-) > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
WebIDL Reviewers Group
As of yesterday, a phabricator reviewers group for WebIDL has been created. If your patch needs review for WebIDL changes, you can tag this group using '*r=#webidl*'. Once specific DOM peer(s) are working with you on a web standard, you should continue to reach out to them for reviews as the standard evolves. We're testing this out, and hope this will more evenly spread review load and make it easier to find a peer :-) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Non-XPCOM in-RAM Unicode representation conversions have moved
Unicode representation conversions (and range queries like "is this in the ASCII range?") for data we already have inside the engine (i.e. we're not doing IO with an external source/destination) for the cases where the conversion doesn't need to be able to resize a target XPCOM string have moved. They are no longer in nsReadableUtils.h. They are now in mozilla/TextUtils.h, mozilla/Utf8.h, and mozilla/Latin1.h. As a result, the functions have moved to the mozilla:: namespace and now follow MfbtCase (IsAscii and IsUtf8 instead of the old IsASCII and IsUTF8). Support for external encodings and streaming continues to be in mozilla/Encoding.h. Conversions where the target is an XPCOM string remain in nsReadableUtils.h. -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@mozilla.com ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Authentication Working Group
The additional time for the WebAuthn working group is overall good and worth supporting. The bulk of the additional work to be done is focused on improving the ergonomics of the existing Level 1 spec, both for developers and for individuals using the capabilities within their lives. On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > Web Authentication Working Group > https://www.w3.org/2019/08/webauthn-proposed-charter.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Sep/0001.html > > The differences from the previous charter are: > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F08%2Fweb-authentication-charter.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F08%2Fwebauthn-proposed-charter.html > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > Monday, September 30. > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > support or oppose it. > > -David > > -- > 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 > 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 > Before I built a wall I'd ask to know > What I was walling in or walling out, > And to whom I was like to give offense. >- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
