Aaron Klotz, Avi Halachmi and I have been studying Firefox's performance on
Android Windows over the last few weeks as part of an effort to evaluate
Firefox content performance and find actionable issues. We're analyzing and
measuring how well Firefox scrolls pages, loads sites, and navigates
Background: Firefox shutdown hangs are turned into shutdown crashes by a
watchdog thread [1] that forces a crash if shutdown hasn't completed within 1
minute. Thanks to the watchdog and the Windows profile unlocker [2], shutdown
hangs aren't as frustrating as they used to be. However, shutdown
KaiRo pointed out another reason to reduce shutdown hang rates on IRC: it's
lousy UX. The crash-reporter dialog pops up a minute after the user closed
Firefox
On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 4:37:41 PM UTC-4, RyanVM wrote:
On 7/6/2015 4:34 PM, Vladan D wrote:
Background: Firefox shutdown hangs
On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 5:00:36 PM UTC-4, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
On 06/07/15 22:48, Vladan D wrote:
KaiRo pointed out another reason to reduce shutdown hang rates on IRC: it's
lousy UX. The crash-reporter dialog pops up a minute after the user closed
Firefox
That's bug
On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 4:09:18 PM UTC-4, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Actually, I was just thinking about introducing a priority-to-60fps
mode, activated e.g. while the user is scrolling the foreground tab, or
perhaps during animations in the foreground tab.
Whenever we are running
Correction: the presentation is tomorrow, Tuesday August 11th (not the 10th)
On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 5:25:33 PM UTC-4, Vladan D wrote:
Hi all,
On Tuesday August 10th, Anthony Zhang will do a brief end-of-internship
presentation showing how you can answer your questions with Telemetry
Tests are reliable if they detect regressions, aren't very noisy, and if they
measure things that have a real impact on actual Firefox user experience.
We're using past experience with the tests to determine which ones meet this
criteria.
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 5:45:35 PM UTC-4,
CloudFront was serving stale data, it's fixed now. Give it another try?
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 3:06:45 PM UTC-4, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/7/15 2:26 PM, Vladan Djeric wrote:
Let us know if you find bugs, notice missing functionality, or if anything
is ambiguous or counter-intuitive.
> Unfortunately, the BHR Telemetry data from both Aurora 43 & Beta 44
> experiments suggests that e10s is jankier than non-e10s. This holds true
> for profiles with & without extensions.
>
> However, we have identified bugs causing inaccuracies in BHR reporting and
> we are working to imporve BHR
9 matches
Mail list logo
