We haven't run any studies on security indicators as yet.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Bram Pitoyo <b...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I’ve forwarded this conversation thread to our UX researcher and designer, > Francis and Jacqueline. If we’ve run any studies, they’d be able to link us > to a report. > > On 12 February 2018 at 11:58, Karl Dubost <kdub...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Johann, >> >> Le 10 févr. 2018 à 00:51, Johann Hofmann <jhofm...@mozilla.com> a écrit : >> > There's a valid concern around warning fatigue (plastering so many >> sites with "Insecure" that users easily dismiss it) and we made those prefs >> to be able to run user studies on it. >> >> >> Did Mozilla run UX studies about it? If yes, links would be appreciated. >> >> Secure/Insecure intuitively seems for me a wrong metaphor. Or more >> exactly a metaphor which has been carried away too long and has now lost >> its meaning. Some HTTPS sites are/will not be secure. And some HTTP sites >> will be more innocuous than some HTTPS sites. >> >> >> >> -- >> Karl Dubost, mozilla 💡 Webcompat >> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> firefox-dev mailing list >> firefox-...@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev >> > > -- *Francis Djabri* Firefox User Research e: fdja...@mozilla.com +1 (415) 696-2786 <(415)%20696-2786> _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
