W3C Proposed Recommendations: WAI-ARIA and Core Accessibility API Mappings

2017-11-30 Thread L. David Baron
part of a plan for future extensibility. (These are specs that we implement.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I

Re: Intent to ship: CSS Shapes Module Level 1 (partial)

2017-11-29 Thread L. David Baron
le when they don't work correctly. I think if the remainder of the feature can be done soon then it may make sense to wait to ship the whole thing together, but if there's something that makes the image part hard or unlikely to happen soon, then it's reasonable to ship

Re: Intent to unship: mozmm CSS unit.

2017-11-14 Thread L. David Baron
should remove it. Would you be able to try searching for those minutes? I know there's been an in-person discussion (and I think it was at a meeting at a TPAC a few yeas ago). -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Cooperative Scheduling of Background Tasks (requestIdleCallback)

2017-10-10 Thread L. David Baron
to hear from somebody knowledgable about the spec and our implementation before just doing that. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: Status of deprecating non-secure HTTP

2017-09-25 Thread L. David Baron
on-secure context, and @supports would do the right thing. So I don't think this requires any new *features* to be spec'd in CSS (since @supports would work, and is the right thing to use), although it probably does require a small amount of new spec prose to explain how it works. -David -- 턞

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Authentication Working Group

2017-09-20 Thread L. David Baron
to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I

Re: Stylo now the default configuration for mozilla-central

2017-09-05 Thread L. David Baron
:Servo (or deleting the function, of course). Otherwise we risk taking substantial regressions in the CSS code backing much of our user interface. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Be

Re: Coding style: Argument alignment

2017-08-29 Thread L. David Baron
ouching additional lines, which is both changes blame and is extra work (although it's not extra work if we're using clang-format tree-wide). Option (b) is also more likely to lead to overly long lines that require wrapping. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Commerce Interest Group

2017-08-28 Thread L. David Baron
uses the old name of the IG rather than the new one. = -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: WebVR Working Group

2017-08-18 Thread L. David Baron
ontributors involved. > > > > Short answer: historically when W3C WGs move forward without strong > > implementer participation, they have very low chances of success, high > > chances of failure, and especially of damaging good will in relevant > > communities. Your conc

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: WebVR Working Group

2017-08-16 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2017-07-12 12:20 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2017-07-12 06:48 -0500, Lars Bergstrom wrote: > > There is some contention in the WebVR community group around the submission > > of this charter proposal, as there is currently no public s

Re: disabled non-e10s tests on trunk

2017-08-08 Thread L. David Baron
la-central/search?q=skip-if%28browserIsRemote although that search isn't exhaustive, and contains some tests that we still run under some conditions. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Commerce Interest Group

2017-07-17 Thread L. David Baron
should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom

Proposed W3C Charter: (Accessibility) Education and Outreach Working Group

2017-07-13 Thread L. David Baron
, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out

Re: Bulk Closing Intermittents

2017-07-12 Thread L. David Baron
eave-open' keyword so that it gets resolved as FIXED when the changeset is merged from autoland or mozilla-inbound into mozilla-central. (This is easy to forget.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozill

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: WebVR Working Group

2017-07-12 Thread L. David Baron
t; - Lars > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > The W3C is proposing a new charter for: > > > > WebVR Working Group > > https://www.w3.org/2017/07/vr-wg-charter.html > > https://lists.w3.o

Re: W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-07-11 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2017-07-05 20:58 -0700, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On July 6, 2017 at 1:40:13 PM, L. David Baron (dba...@dbaron.org) wrote: > > I've taken what you (Tantek) wrote and made minor changes to yield > > the following Formal Objection to the Web Platform WG charter. > >

Re: W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-07-11 Thread L. David Baron
On Tuesday 2017-07-11 11:38 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2017-07-05 11:02 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > > On Friday 2017-05-12 15:58 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > > > The W3C gave advance notice that 2 new charters are under > > > development: > >

Re: W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-07-11 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2017-07-05 11:02 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2017-05-12 15:58 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C gave advance notice that 2 new charters are under > > development: > > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/201

Proposed W3C Charter: WebVR Working Group

2017-07-11 Thread L. David Baron
support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like

Proposed W3C Charter: WebAssembly Working Group

2017-07-10 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2017-05-24 09:30 -0400, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C gave advance notice that a charter is under development for > a new working group: > > WebAssembly Working Group > https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/webassembly.html > https://github.com/w3c/charter

Re: W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-07-05 Thread L. David Baron
is providing any kind of meaningful update to HTML, when meaningful updates (i.e., things that are implemented or fixed in browsers that web developers can then depend on) are only based on WHATWG HTML at this point. -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢

Re: W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-07-05 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2017-05-12 15:58 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C gave advance notice that 2 new charters are under > development: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2017May/0006.html > (which contains brief descriptions of what has changed) > >

Proposed W3C Charter: SVG Working Group

2017-06-23 Thread L. David Baron
, which now includes the SVG Integration work. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Intent to ship: SourceMap header

2017-05-26 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2017-05-26 11:53 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "David" == L David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> writes: > > David> I agree it would be good to have a somewhat more "proper" spec for > David> this. In terms of process, I thin

Re: Intent to ship: SourceMap header

2017-05-24 Thread L. David Baron
hat more "proper" spec for this. In terms of process, I think probably the most important (and lowest overhead) aspect of "proper" is having the revision history of the specification in publicly visible version control (such as github), and a way for people to raise issues that wi

W3C Charter Advance Notice: WebAssembly Working Group

2017-05-24 Thread L. David Baron
e. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to gi

Re: Avoiding jank in async functions/promises?

2017-05-17 Thread L. David Baron
also: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/requestIdleCallback https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Background_Tasks_API I'm not sure whether it works for privileged (chrome) JS, but it seems like it ought to... -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

W3C Charter Advance Notice: Web Platform (recharter) & Service Workers WGs

2017-05-12 Thread L. David Baron
as statements "from Mozilla" on the Advisory Committee mailing list. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I w

Re: Using references vs. pointers in C++ code

2017-05-10 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2017-05-10 13:10 +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:56:03PM -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > > On Wednesday 2017-05-10 02:43 +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > > The issue I have with per-type conventions is that it doesn't sca

Re: Using references vs. pointers in C++ code

2017-05-09 Thread L. David Baron
ces. We shouldn't treat the two style set classes differently. So it should be passed with pointers, not references. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wa

Re: Using references vs. pointers in C++ code

2017-05-09 Thread L. David Baron
ill just write a "*" whether or not their existing code guarantees a non-null pointer; at least that was my experience in the early days of Gecko. Perhaps we have better code review now... but I'm somewhat skeptical of that given that I think we've been relying on tests more and review

Proposed W3C Charter: Media and Entertainment IG (was Web and TV IG)

2017-05-01 Thread L. David Baron
support, comments, or objections through Friday, May 26, 2017. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢

W3C Proposed & Candidate Recommendations: Social Web

2017-05-01 Thread L. David Baron
for the first time at this stage, although that's a little less true when review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built

W3C Candidate Recommendation: Beacon

2017-05-01 Thread L. David Baron
-- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense

Proposed W3C Charter: Publishing Working Group

2017-04-25 Thread L. David Baron
/2017Apr/0021.html -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like

Proposed W3C Charter: TV Control Working Group

2017-04-25 Thread L. David Baron
. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense

Re: Intent to implement: CSS property `line-height-step`

2017-04-19 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2017-03-31 07:55 -0400, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2017-03-31 12:11 +0800, Tommy Kuo wrote: > > **Summary** > > > > I am intent to implement the property `line-height-step`. And it would be > > disabled behind the pref `layout.css.line-heig

W3C Candidate Recommendation: requestIdleCallback (deadline today)

2017-04-18 Thread L. David Baron
that's a little less true now that the review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: A reminder about commit messages: they should be useful

2017-04-17 Thread L. David Baron
undamentally the wrong UI for bug tracking as I described in https://dbaron.org/log/20120816-bug-system and https://dbaron.org/log/20130129-bugzilla and as a result I don't pay much attention to the comments in bug reports; I mainly read the summary. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: intent to implement/ship: MediaQueryListEvent

2017-04-11 Thread L. David Baron
the same behavior, since 2014. This sounds good to me; thanks for cleaning this up. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was

Re: Enabling Pointer Events in Firefox (desktop) Nightly on Mac and Linux

2017-04-05 Thread L. David Baron
That's actually a pretty easy question to answer: https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/unsanctioned-tracking/ (Unsanctioned Web Tracking, W3C TAG Finding 17 July 2015) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.

Re: Enabling Pointer Events in Firefox (desktop) Nightly on Mac and Linux

2017-04-04 Thread L. David Baron
nd Chrome already ship it. > > Tests: WPT The list of disabled tests in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284758 seems somewhat concerning. > Security & Privacy Concerns: none Well, it's implemented in C++, but we don't have a better option right now. -David -- 턞 L. Dav

Re: Intent to implement: CSS property `line-height-step`

2017-03-31 Thread L. David Baron
tually desirable. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to g

Re: The future of commit access policy for core Firefox

2017-03-10 Thread L. David Baron
o fail for some substantial set of important cases (such as rebases, as you mention). (That's a piece of interdiff from rebasing my own patch queue earlier this week.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.m

Re: Please write good commit messages before asking for code review

2017-03-09 Thread L. David Baron
David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense.

Re: Please write good commit messages before asking for code review

2017-03-09 Thread L. David Baron
as I think they should, for summary views). An old example of this that I like is this commit: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/830111e10951 -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Re: Project Stockwell (reducing intermittents) - March 2017 update

2017-03-08 Thread L. David Baron
ario where I asked for > more time and was denied that. I think it's often reasonable to expect a *backout* of the cause within less than two weeks, although perhaps not if the immediate trigger was changes in test chunking. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/

Re: Intent to ship: WebVR on Windows in Release

2017-03-02 Thread L. David Baron
e WebVR standards community here? And is your intend to support the features in 1.1 forever, or to take them away at some point? -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Befor

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Application Security Working Group

2017-02-23 Thread L. David Baron
skimmed the diffs relative to the previous charter. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out

Re: Should &&/|| really be at the end of lines?

2017-02-16 Thread L. David Baron
09 [3], shortly after a discussion here > >> > [4] that seemed to focus on the dot operator in Javascript. In that > >> > discussion, &&/|| appear in examples at the end of lines and nobody > >> > talks about that (because it was not the m

Re: Intent to implement and ship CSS 'appearance' with '-webkit-appearance' as an alias. Unship '-moz-appearance'.

2017-02-16 Thread L. David Baron
hich leads to extra work for Web developers and to Web-compatibility problems for us. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: Project Stockwell - February 2017 update

2017-02-14 Thread L. David Baron
This also makes it much harder to tell if bugs are being mis-classified (e.g., two different problems being starred into one bug). (I thought the point of structured logging was to make it easier to get this sort of data.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaro

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
OK, I sent the response far enough before the deadline (which is Sunday January 15) that other W3C members may have a chance to see it before the deadline: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Dec/0010.html -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Data on the Web Best Practices

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage.) My inclination is to abstain from this review, but could probably be convinced to send other forms of supportive response. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Cryptography API

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
knowledgable about the spec and our implementation before just doing that. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling

6 W3C Candidate Recommendations on XPath and XQuery

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
than a PR.) However, I'd note that I'm inclined to abstain from this review. This is a set of XML-related work that's happening at W3C and isn't particularly related to the browser world these days. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

W3C Candidate Recommendation: Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module 1.0

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
, however, that there have been previous opportunities to make comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage, although that's a little less true now that the review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

5 W3C Candidate Recommendations from Social Web WG

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
at this stage, although that's a little less true now that the review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) I suspect Tantek is in support given that he's a co-chair of the working group. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
to track the Holder. -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give

Re: Intent to Implement CSS Box Alignment on block containers

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
t* work on blocks. I'm happy to see this happen sooner rather than later, to reduce this risk. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know

Re: Intent to Implement: adding vector effects non-scaling-size, non-rotation and fixed-position to SVG

2016-12-27 Thread L. David Baron
age, when used as a background-image or border-image, etc.? -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling

Re: Intent to implement and ship: CSS display:flow-root

2016-12-21 Thread L. David Baron
f the implementation > > Security & Privacy Concerns: none Sounds good to me, except that I think it's worth explicitly raising on www-style that we're planning to ship this, since the spec for it isn't yet in (or near) CR. (The bug says the editors believe the fe

Re: Firefox Behaving Improperly to Standard

2016-12-20 Thread L. David Baron
, and it's overridden by the more specific language that actually says how overflow handling should work. > 4) overflow:auto is ignored both in interpretation and scrollbar implications No idea what you mean by this. But I'm pretty sure changing this would lead to unexpected scrollbars o

Re: Intent to ship: CSS Mask Image

2016-12-15 Thread L. David Baron
e.cgi?id=1312613=1_resolved=0 I'm in support of shipping this work, assuming that the performance concerns that delayed it have been addressed. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
. (I'd note, however, that there have been previous opportunities to make comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage, although that's a little less true now that the review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) -David -- 턞 L. David

Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: SVG Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-12-09 18:15 -1000, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > Web Security Interest Group > https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/websec-ig.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Nov/0009.html OK, ple

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Security Interest Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Proposed W3C Charter: SVG Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Proposed W3C Charter: Tracking Protection Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-12-09 18:12 -1000, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a new charter for: Please ignore this thread, sorry. I resent the SVG charter with a correct subject line. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozi

Proposed W3C Charter: SVG Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask

Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask

Re: Intent to implement: CSS {background,mask}-repeat-{x/y} properties

2016-11-24 Thread L. David Baron
rs do this. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to w

Re: Intent to implement: CSS {background,mask}-repeat-{x/y} properties

2016-11-24 Thread L. David Baron
gnized" status mean, and how does it differ from "Shipped"? -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was wallin

W3C Proposed Recommendation: CSP2 (Content Security Policy 2)

2016-11-08 Thread L. David Baron
or formally object to something, please say so in this thread. (I'd note, however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-11-04 Thread L. David Baron
forward in this area is for the community to take some time to consider security and privacy more carefully, and come back later with a charter that reflects that consideration. -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https

Proposed W3C Charter: Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

2016-11-04 Thread L. David Baron
. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. This group is a proposed reformulation of the current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) working group. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-11-04 Thread L. David Baron
nt of the people involved. Of > >> particular concern is how the group intends to manage interactions > >> with SOP. Do they intend to allow the web at large to connect to > >> parts of the car? The security architecture is worrying in its lack > >> of detail. &g

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Webmention

2016-11-03 Thread L. David Baron
for the first time at this stage.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2016-10-26 Thread L. David Baron
re specifically as well. > > * Or, if no such community group exists, make it clearer that it's > a hypothetical community group. (and record it as a support-with-optional-changes). -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

2016-10-25 Thread L. David Baron
> > > > Support revised charter. > > > > I don't know of our current implementation plans on this WG's deliverables. > > > > The most recent discussion here of any of the deliverables of the WG > > was on "PresentationAPI", in particular a &

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Media Source Extensions (MSE)

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage.) (This is something we implement in Gecko, although I'm not sure if we implement everything in the spec, or how involved Mozilla folks have been in the spec process.) -David -- 턞 L. David

Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
involved in the discussions that led to this charter. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out

Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
/details?group=46884=1=org#_MozillaFoundation -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out

Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
area but the charter as currently > proposed may need some work. > > > > > Let me know what you think > > Ben > > On 11 October 2016 at 02:52, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > The W3C is proposing a new charter for: > > > &

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: HTML 5.1

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
file a nonformal objection with those > two points (technical: drop rev, overall: HTML5.1 problematic as a > whole). > > Thanks, > > Tantek > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:45 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday 2016-10-1

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: HTML 5.1

2016-10-13 Thread L. David Baron
-11 https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507 -David > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:46 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C > > (including Mozilla) to vote on, before it proceeds to the final > >

Re: Intent to ship: css multi-column properties (unprefixed)

2016-10-13 Thread L. David Baron
b Compat, Mozilla > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla h

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WebIDL Level 1

2016-10-11 Thread L. David Baron
things to Recommendation every so often so that it's unambiguous that they're covered by the W3C's patent policy. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WebIDL Level 1

2016-10-10 Thread L. David Baron
On Tuesday 2016-10-11 07:07 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2016, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > I'd note that Mozillians have been very involved in editing the > > specification, but I'm not entirely sure of our level of involv

Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-10 Thread L. David Baron
this is more of a (set of?) research projects. W3C has an existing Interest Group (not a Working Group, so not designed to write Recommendation-track specifications) in this area: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/ . -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla

W3C Proposed Recommendation: WebIDL Level 1

2016-10-10 Thread L. David Baron
at this stage.) I'd note that Mozillians have been very involved in editing the specification, but I'm not entirely sure of our level of involvement in stabilizing the "release branch" to be a Level 1 recommendation. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.

W3C Proposed Recommendation: HTML 5.1

2016-10-10 Thread L. David Baron
. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-09-30 14:02 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Also, just found this in the charter: > announcement > Not really acceptable. I think it should link to the same URL as the other "(announcement)" link. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http:

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
ir charter scope. Or are these things that are just starting out rather than things that have been in progress for a while? (That seems unlikely, since I've been hearing about some of them for quite a while.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozil

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 10:42 +0200, Ms2ger wrote: > On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-28 Thread L. David Baron
ents or objections through this Friday, September 30. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Moz

  1   2   3   4   5   >