Re: New and improved "about:config" for Firefox Desktop
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 11:37:14 PM UTC+1, Paolo Amadini wrote: > On 1/25/2019 10:39 AM, Axel Hecht wrote: > > filter [...] by modified > > This is bug 1502867, it is something we've considered but I'm a bit > conflicted as it's only really used on 0.4% of page views and we have a > better section dedicated to that use case in "about:support". Does it take into account that the sorting is preserved between about:config calls? Also, the list in about:support isn't complete (that's why it's called IMPORTANT modified preferences and not simply modified preferences) and it's not editable so I really wouldn't call it even remotely better. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Re-visiting the DOM tree depth limit in layout
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 1:41:43 PM UTC+2, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Can we ask Windows to give us more stack space? > -- Don't know if it's possible to set it dynamically at runtime, but Visual Studio supports setting it at compile time (in linker options). ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Updating 32-bit Windows users to 64-bit Windows builds?
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 11:47:15 PM UTC+2, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > Lawrence Mandel writes: > > > Do we need this criteria? > > > > RAM - Does it hurt to move an instance that has <4GB? > > Yes. OOM will be more common with 64-bit builds on systems with > less RAM because 64-bit builds use more memory. Quite the opposite actually. The overhead is negligible, but the stability improvement is tremendous. After switching to 64-bit I haven't crashed even once for several months, whereas on 32-bit I crashed several times a week. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
