Re: Structured bindings and minimum GCC & clang versions

2019-08-16 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:51 AM Eric Rahm wrote: > > We are actively working on this. Unfortunately, as expected, its never as > simple as we'd like. Updating the minimum gcc version ( > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536848) is blocked on getting > our hazard builds updated,

Re: Structured bindings and minimum GCC & clang versions

2019-08-16 Thread Eric Rahm
We are actively working on this. Unfortunately, as expected, its never as simple as we'd like. Updating the minimum gcc version ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536848) is blocked on getting our hazard builds updated, updating to c++17 has some of it's own quirks. We're currently at

Re: Structured bindings and minimum GCC & clang versions

2019-08-16 Thread Gerald Squelart
On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 4:19:20 PM UTC+10, Henri Sivonen wrote: > This week, I wrote some code that made me wish we already had support > for structured bindings and return by initializer list (both from > C++17) for mozilla::Tuple. > > That is, if we have > mozilla::Tuple Foo() > it would