On 12/14/2014 9:41 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-12-13 1:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
On 12/13/2014 12:12 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I
see no
reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good
solution in
l
On 2014-12-13 1:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
On 12/13/2014 12:12 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I see no
reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good
solution in
less than a month. (As in yes go ahead and lan
On 12/13/2014 12:12 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I see no
reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good solution in
less than a month. (As in yes go ahead and land that patch)
Thunderbird is not yet ready.
-
On 2014-12-13 1:12 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I see
no reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good
solution in less than a month. (As in yes go ahead and land that patch)
Thanks! For those who are intere
ia work then it might be reasonable to switch sooner.
>>>>>
>>>>> This set: http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>> What MS compiler does that list require? There's a number of people
>>>>> building with VS2012,
hat list require? There's a number of people
>>>> building with VS2012, would that still be supported?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Jeff Muizelaar"
Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Muizelaar"
> To: "Ehsan Akhgari"
> Cc: "dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org list"
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Eh
Message -
>>>
>>>> From: "Jeff Muizelaar"
>>>> To: "Ehsan Akhgari"
>>>> Cc: "dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org list" >>> org>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
>>>>
Syd Polk wrote:
Does MSVC 2013 run on Windows XP? We still support Win XP for the browser; do
we support building on it?
You can't create a stock build on XP since the latest SDK is 7.1 and the
gamepad code needs 8.0 and the DirectX code would like it too.
--
Warning: May contain traces o
On 2014-10-16, 6:24 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 2:27 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 5:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the
37-38 time frame?
Firefox 38 will become the ne
On 10/16/14 2:27 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 5:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the
37-38 time frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should dr
t;Ehsan Akhgari"
Cc: "dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org list"
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was
On 2014-10-16, 5:02 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 10/16/2014 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler
deprecation schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC
4.4 for B2G, I expect we’ll
On 2014-10-16, 5:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the
37-38 time frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should drop old compilers *before* the ESR or after,
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the 37-38 time
frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should drop old compilers *before* the ESR or after, but it should
probably inform the decision.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Syd Polk wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 14:49, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
>
>> After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
>> schedule is not very clear.
>>
>> Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4
>>
On Oct 16, 2014, at 14:49, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
> schedule is not very clear.
>
> Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4
> for B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building
On 10/16/2014 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010 an
r does that list require? There's a number of people building
> with VS2012, would that still be supported?
>
> David
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jeff Muizelaar"
>> To: "Ehsan Akhgari"
>> Cc: "dev-platform@lists.mozilla.o
On 2014-10-16 12:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> GCC is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077549. No
> specific bug or plans for MSVC2010, but I'd be open to killing support
> for it on the next release train.
MSVC 2010 means we have to maintain a separate no-AVX2 config for the
media p
rm@lists.mozilla.org list"
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> >> After some discussion som
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
>> After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
>> schedule is not very clear.
>>
>> Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4
>> for
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010 an
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010 and GCC 4.4
in the near term.
This is importan
24 matches
Mail list logo
