On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 09:30:06AM -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/10/19 3:31 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
In what way is dom::Promise annoying to use from C++?
The one thing I know about that's pretty annoying is if you receive
the promise from someone else and want to add reactions to it.
On 12/10/19 3:31 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
In what way is dom::Promise annoying to use from C++?
The one thing I know about that's pretty annoying is if you receive the
promise from someone else and want to add reactions to it.
PromiseNativeHandler kinda works, but then you get JS::Values and
Thanks to all who replied, including Kris whose reply seems to have not
made it back to the list. As per usual when I ask for help I've been
immediately distracted by something more urgent and not got back to the
problem at hand. :-/
As some pointed out this would be a lot easier if I was
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 11:40:52PM -0500, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
The problem with MozPromise is that it doesn't integrate well if you
use XPIDL interfaces, so you have this annoying issue that if you want
to use XPIDL integration, you have to use mozilla::dom::Promise, which
is annoying to
Also sprach Joshua Cranmer:
> The problem with MozPromise is that it doesn't integrate well if you use
> XPIDL interfaces, so you have this annoying issue that if you want to use
> XPIDL integration, you have to use mozilla::dom::Promise, which is annoying
> to use from C++. A third wrinkle,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:20:12AM +1300, Geoff Lankow wrote:
Hi all
I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS
context so that doesn't really seem like an option. The best
alternative I've come up
On 12/5/2019 6:33 PM, Gerald Squelart wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 9:20:21 AM UTC+11, Geoff Lankow wrote:
Hi all
I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context
so that doesn't really seem
Hi all
I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context
so that doesn't really seem like an option. The best alternative I've
come up with is to create some sort of listener object and pass it to
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 7:20:21 AM UTC+9, Geoff Lankow wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
> like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context
> so that doesn't really seem like an option. The best alternative
On 12/5/19 5:20 PM, Geoff Lankow wrote:
I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context
Is that because both the implementation of the API and the consumer of
the API will be C++?
For what it's
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 9:20:21 AM UTC+11, Geoff Lankow wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd
> like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context
> so that doesn't really seem like an option. The best alternative
11 matches
Mail list logo
