Re: IDNA processing

2017-05-18 Thread Gervase Markham
On 18/05/17 14:14, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > That's fairly non-specific, unless you really mean that you don't want > "A" lowercased. Well, yes, as you note, with UTS#46 or whatever it is. > I don't think it's that big, there's plenty of other things disallowed > that we should always be able

Re: IDNA processing

2017-05-18 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: > Well, you generally know my opinion :-) IDNA 2008 non-transitional. That's fairly non-specific, unless you really mean that you don't want "A" lowercased. > ISTM that the 3rd/4th placed hyphens were banned so the

Re: IDNA processing

2017-05-15 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/05/17 08:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > For about five years I've been trying to figure out the IDNA algorithm > that a) browsers follow and b) browsers want to follow, but I've not > had much luck thus far getting folks to reply. E.g., >

IDNA processing

2017-05-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
If this is better suited elsewhere, such as dev-tech-network, please let me know. For about five years I've been trying to figure out the IDNA algorithm that a) browsers follow and b) browsers want to follow, but I've not had much luck thus far getting folks to reply. E.g.,