On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:47 AM Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:06 PM Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
> > Please note that Firefox will grant storage access permissions
> > automatically under certain circumstances for web compatibility reasons,
> so
> > even when the iframe has
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:06 PM Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Please note that Firefox will grant storage access permissions
> automatically under certain circumstances for web compatibility reasons, so
> even when the iframe has never called this API it may still obtain storage
> access. In order to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:19 AM James Graham
wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 21:27, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > Very cool, I did not know this! It seems like test_driver.bless() is
> > what we need here for simulating a user activation gesture.
> >
> > However it sounds like in this case you may
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:10 AM Mike O'Neill wrote:
> This is great but I have a couple queries.
> >
> >In our implementation, once Storage Access API grants storage access,
> >all existing third-party iframes on the same first party will receive
> that
> >storage access, whereas in
On 07/09/2018 21:27, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Very cool, I did not know this! It seems like test_driver.bless() is
what we need here for simulating a user activation gesture.
However it sounds like in this case you may need to add test-only APIs
for manipulating internal browser state.
On 09.09.2018 11:05, Mike O'Neill wrote:
>>
>> We don’t necessarily believe that a model where the user is asked whether
>> they consent to sharing their data with third-party trackers is ideal,
>> because explaining the implications of the data sharing is very hard, and
>> there are many
This is great but I have a couple queries.
>
>In our implementation, once Storage Access API grants storage access,
>all existing third-party iframes on the same first party will receive that
>storage access, whereas in WebKit’s implementation they each would require
>calling
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:49 PM James Graham wrote:
> > web-platform-tests: Our implementation unfortunately doesn’t come with
> > web-platform-tests, for two reasons. One is that there is currently no
> way
> > to mock user gestures in web platform tests [4], and the second reason is
> > that
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:32 PM Tom Ritter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
>
>>In our implementation, once the Storage Access API grants storage
>>access, all newly created third-party iframes of the same origin will
>> have
>>storage access for a
web-platform-tests: Our implementation unfortunately doesn’t come with
web-platform-tests, for two reasons. One is that there is currently no way
to mock user gestures in web platform tests [4], and the second reason is
that furthermore, our implementation also depends on being able to
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
>In our implementation, once the Storage Access API grants storage
>access, all newly created third-party iframes of the same origin will
> have
>storage access for a period of time (currently defined at 30 days)
> without
>
Hi everyone,
As we recently announced [0], we are working on a number of new
anti-tracking features which are intended to change the current approach in
Firefox with regards to how user’s data is shared with third-party trackers
as the user browses the web.
In the old world (the status quo for
12 matches
Mail list logo
