Re: Intent to unship: -moz-placeholder pseudo-element and pseudo-class

2017-05-25 Thread Mike Taylor
On 5/25/17 5:48 AM, Ku(顧思捷)CJ wrote: > Mike, do we get any complaint about not supporting webkit placeholder > alias? Nah, not that I'm aware of. I was just looking through GitHub search results and finding some stuff that only includes webkit-input-placeholder:

Re: Intent to unship: -moz-placeholder pseudo-element and pseudo-class

2017-05-24 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/24/17 1:06 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: [1] Sadly, that code is already buggy in Firefox: it uses ":moz-placeholder", which doesn't parse. The thing that parses is

Re: Intent to unship: -moz-placeholder pseudo-element and pseudo-class

2017-05-24 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi CJ, On 5/23/17 10:13 PM, Ku(顧思捷)CJ wrote: > I intend to remove "-moz-placeholder" pseudo-element and pseudo-class in > bug 1300896. > > We already supported canonical version of them: > 1. "::placeholder" in bug 1069012, FF 51. > 2. ":placeholder-shown" in bug 1069015, FF 51. > > To support

Re: Intent to unship: -moz-placeholder pseudo-element and pseudo-class

2017-05-24 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 24/05/2017 03:13, Ku(顧思捷)CJ wrote: I intend to remove "-moz-placeholder" pseudo-element and pseudo-class in bug 1300896. Which will ship in which release? 55 or 56? Esp. asking given the upcoming feature freeze for 55. ~ Gijs ___ dev-platform

Intent to unship: -moz-placeholder pseudo-element and pseudo-class

2017-05-23 Thread 顧思捷
I intend to remove "-moz-placeholder" pseudo-element and pseudo-class in bug 1300896. We already supported canonical version of them: 1. "::placeholder" in bug 1069012, FF 51. 2. ":placeholder-shown" in bug 1069015, FF 51. To support these mozilla-specific aliases introduces special-case