Sorry I forgot to link to the bug itself:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372 which hasn't changed
from last time.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:18 PM Jonathan Kingston wrote:
>
> Since the deprecation of this feature the usage of this feature has
> reached near 0 numbers in our
Since the deprecation of this feature the usage of this feature has reached
near 0 numbers in our usage counters[1]. 0.003% based on 64 beta [2]
The specification has removed xml:base many years ago and this change has
an advantage of code simplification and also reduces the need to compute
base
On Wed, May 24, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> xml:base (bug 1349024) has been removed in Nightly 55 for 2 months
> now, and we haven't sen any reports of ill effects. Let's have this
> testing expand to Beta 55, and on to Release if all goes well. Bug
> 1350521 tracks this change riding
xml:base (bug 1349024) has been removed in Nightly 55 for 2 months
now, and we haven't sen any reports of ill effects. Let's have this
testing expand to Beta 55, and on to Release if all goes well. Bug
1350521 tracks this change riding the trains.
--Jet
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Xidorn
On 2017-02-16 6:06 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 01:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>> On 2017-02-16 1:51 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>>> Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>> * It has been removed from the spec years ago.
>>> * No other
On 2/16/17 5:52 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
Is there any reason you think we should keep the Get/SetExplicitBaseURI
API?
As long as we can address its current users in some other way, no.
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 01:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2017-02-16 1:51 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> > Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
> >
> > Summary:
> > * It has been removed from the spec years ago.
> > * No other browser supports it.
> > * We pay
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 01:36 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/16/17 7:12 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> > The perf penalty of xml:base is basically that we have to dynamically
> > construct a URL from bottom to top along the tree whenever we need a
> > base URL of an element. And since this URL may be
On 2/16/17 7:12 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
The perf penalty of xml:base is basically that we have to dynamically
construct a URL from bottom to top along the tree whenever we need a
base URL of an element. And since this URL may be constructed
dynamically, the caller would have to hold a strong
On 2017-02-16 1:51 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
>
> Summary:
> * It has been removed from the spec years ago.
> * No other browser supports it.
> * We pay performance penalty for it.
> * It makes things trickier for stylo to handle URL
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017, at 10:25 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
> On 16/02/2017 06:51, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> > Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
> >
> > Summary:
> > * It has been removed from the spec years ago.
> > * No other browser supports it.
> > * We pay performance
On 16/02/2017 06:51, Xidorn Quan wrote:
Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
Summary:
* It has been removed from the spec years ago.
* No other browser supports it.
* We pay performance penalty for it.
* It makes things trickier for stylo to handle URL values.
The
Tracking bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372
Summary:
* It has been removed from the spec years ago.
* No other browser supports it.
* We pay performance penalty for it.
* It makes things trickier for stylo to handle URL values.
The tricky thing is that
13 matches
Mail list logo
