Yeah, this caught me out yesterday. xpcshell tests on Android have, for
instance, a pre-existing default search engine, whereas xpcshell tests
running on desktop do not.
It would be nice if this were documented on MDN.
~ Gijs
On 20/06/2014 02:24, Mark Finkle wrote:
Fennec/Android does have
Fennec/Android does have the ability to run xpcshell-like tests. These tests
are JS scripts loaded into a framework that simulates the xpcshell system.
Technically it's not xpcshell though. The JS script is loaded into tab of the
Fennec browser. If the JS script knows this, it can create a
Support for mochitest-chrome on mobile is sorely needed in devtools. It
would increase our test coverage there by at least an order of magnitude.
Panos
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't comment on the importance of the a-team's other
Could you give some examples of what tests we could run on mobile in chrome?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 6/17/14 4:32 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Many of those tests don't apply to Android or B2G, and for those that
theoretically do, many of them won't work because they rely on XUL
files which aren't supported in B2G, and may not be in Android (not
sure on that point).
I'm told Android uses
Periodically, we field a request to add support for mochitest-chrome to
Android and B2G. To date, we've avoided this by pointing out ways that
mochitest-plain can be used for the same use case, which usually
involves SpecialPowers.
We have a new request for this, in the context of
I can't comment on the importance of the a-team's other priorities, or the
importance of running the tests in consideration on Android/B2G.
However, as the author of SpecialPowers.wrap, I can say that using it for
highly-involved chrome interaction should be considered Extremely Harmful.
These
7 matches
Mail list logo
