Re: Removing GTK2 widget support?

2016-12-25 Thread zbraniecki
On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 6:36:37 PM UTC-8, Mike Hommey wrote: > XP_GNOME comes to a surprise to me. But then it's only used in one > place, and defined in the same place, so it's a local thing... Yea, it just so happens that it's browser.xul ;D But correct, it is a local thing. > As for

Re: Removing GTK2 widget support?

2016-12-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:35:40PM -0800, zbranie...@mozilla.com wrote: > While preparing for the transition to the new localization framework, > I noticed[0] that we use a large number of loosely overlapping > build-time variables to indicate different combinations of widgets, > platforms and

Re: Removing GTK2 widget support?

2016-12-25 Thread zbraniecki
While preparing for the transition to the new localization framework, I noticed[0] that we use a large number of loosely overlapping build-time variables to indicate different combinations of widgets, platforms and GUIs. It would be awesome if we could bring some consistency to that. In

Removing GTK2 widget support?

2016-12-22 Thread lsalzman
This proposal is in reference to this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278282 As it stands currently our builds and testing are done with GTK3, so GTK2 support is effectively tier 3, with no tracking of regressions other than people filing bug reports. GTK2 thus adds to the