Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: IndexedDB 2.0

2017-12-14 Thread Bevis Tseng
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:31 PM Tantek Çelik wrote: > > There is one test row that is red for all implementations, digging into it. > > https://wpt.fyi/IndexedDB/idbobjectstore_createIndex15-autoincrement.htm > > It looks like there are problems with "Auto-Increment Primary Key", > specifically:

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: IndexedDB 2.0

2017-12-14 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 12/14/17 2:30 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: 1. For us (Firefox platform) - do we have bugs filed for the tests we are failing? I did some spot-checks on tests we fail, and all the ones I looked at seem to be related to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1404274 fwiw. -Boris _

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: IndexedDB 2.0

2017-12-14 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Bevis Tseng wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:05 PM L. David Baron wrote: > >> >> Given that we implement the specification as described in: >> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/10/whats-new-in-indexeddb-2-0/ >> and that Bevis (who implemented it) agrees, I intend

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: IndexedDB 2.0

2017-12-14 Thread Bevis Tseng
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:05 PM L. David Baron wrote: > > Given that we implement the specification as described in: > https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/10/whats-new-in-indexeddb-2-0/ > and that Bevis (who implemented it) agrees, I intend to vote in > favor. > > These are small improvement of exist

W3C Proposed Recommendation: IndexedDB 2.0

2017-12-14 Thread L. David Baron
A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C (including Mozilla) to vote on, before it proceeds to the final stage of being a W3C Recomendation: Indexed Database (IndexedDB) API 2.0 https://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB-2/ https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/ Deadline for res