Re: any concerns with dropping the talos test v8 and using AWFY Octane instead?

2016-01-19 Thread jmaher
> >> It seems like another alternative might be to run Octane in Talos, > >> instead of v8_7. > >> > >> It seems like Talos has two advantages over AWFY (correct me if I'm wrong): > >> > >> 1. Easy for developers to schedule jobs via try (maybe less of a concern > >> with a benchmark like this,

Re: any concerns with dropping the talos test v8 and using AWFY Octane instead?

2016-01-12 Thread William Lachance
On 2016-01-11 4:12 PM, Eric Rahm wrote: On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 8:42:11 AM UTC-8, William Lachance wrote: It seems like another alternative might be to run Octane in Talos, instead of v8_7. It seems like Talos has two advantages over AWFY (correct me if I'm wrong): 1. Easy for

Re: any concerns with dropping the talos test v8 and using AWFY Octane instead?

2016-01-11 Thread Till Schneidereit
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:08 PM, wrote: > Currently we run a very outdated version of V8 (version 7) in Talos. This > has since been replaced with Octane in the world of benchmarks. > > AWFY (arewefastyet.com), has been running Octane and catching regressions > faster than

any concerns with dropping the talos test v8 and using AWFY Octane instead?

2016-01-11 Thread jmaher
Currently we run a very outdated version of V8 (version 7) in Talos. This has since been replaced with Octane in the world of benchmarks. AWFY (arewefastyet.com), has been running Octane and catching regressions faster than Talos. There is missing coverage in AWFY, specifically e10s, pgo,

Re: any concerns with dropping the talos test v8 and using AWFY Octane instead?

2016-01-11 Thread William Lachance
On 2016-01-11 9:08 AM, jma...@mozilla.com wrote: Currently we run a very outdated version of V8 (version 7) in Talos. This has since been replaced with Octane in the world of benchmarks. AWFY (arewefastyet.com), has been running Octane and catching regressions faster than Talos. There is