On 13-05-06 9:03 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
On 05/05/2013 09:07 PM, Felipe Gomes wrote:
Is the idea of smartmake to make things also work for non-toplevel
folders? For example, if I edit .cpp only in content/base/src, it
should be enough to rebuild that and toolkit/library. However, `mach
build co
On 05/05/2013 09:07 PM, Felipe Gomes wrote:
Is the idea of smartmake to make things also work for non-toplevel folders? For
example, if I edit .cpp only in content/base/src, it should be enough to
rebuild that and toolkit/library. However, `mach build content/base/src` won't
add toolkit/librar
Is the idea of smartmake to make things also work for non-toplevel folders? For
example, if I edit .cpp only in content/base/src, it should be enough to
rebuild that and toolkit/library. However, `mach build content/base/src` won't
add toolkit/library in that case.
I think this would be a nice
Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 5/3/2013 11:19 AM, Reuben Morais wrote:
You can also use |ac_add_options --with-chrome-format=symlink| to do
something similar for the chrome JAR, it doesn't work with stuff that
is preprocessed, but greatly reduces the number of files that require
rebuildling browser
On 5/3/2013 11:19 AM, Reuben Morais wrote:
You can also use |ac_add_options --with-chrome-format=symlink| to do something
similar for the chrome JAR, it doesn't work with stuff that is preprocessed,
but greatly reduces the number of files that require rebuildling browser/app
when changed.
P
On 13-05-03 12:13 PM, Neil wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-05-02 7:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equiva
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-05-02 7:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach bu
On May 3, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2013-05-03 3:21 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:55:09AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Does it also build browser/app on OSX after every build? Since that is
pretty much required all the time and often missed.
>>>
>
On 2013-05-03 3:21 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:55:09AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Does it also build browser/app on OSX after every build? Since that is
pretty much required all the time and often missed.
Why is that always required? I never build browser/app and have n
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Mike de Boer wrote:
> I think it's much more an issue on Windows; there you need to build
> browser each and every time.
>
Huh? I've been developing on windows for years and haven't seen this.
- Kyle
___
dev-platform ma
I think it's much more an issue on Windows; there you need to build browser
each and every time.
On May 3, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> On 5/3/2013 12:21 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:55:09AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Does it also build browser/app on O
On 5/3/2013 12:21 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:55:09AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Does it also build browser/app on OSX after every build? Since that is
pretty much required all the time and often missed.
Why is that always required? I never build browser/app and have no
On 5/2/2013 11:55 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-05-02 7:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the follo
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:55:09AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >Does it also build browser/app on OSX after every build? Since that is
> >pretty much required all the time and often missed.
>
> Why is that always required? I never build browser/app and have not
> noticed any problems at least f
On 2013-05-02 7:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit/l
On 05/03/2013 12:35 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 4:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the foll
On 13-05-02 4:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit/lib
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit/library
That's correct. Or, if you're not a
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit/library
That's correct. Or, if you're not a mach user, it translates to
make -f client.m
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit/library
Nothing more, nothing less.
Cheers,
Josh
On 05/02/2013 10:58 PM, Axel Hecht wrote:
Hi,
what exactly does this do?
If I
Hi,
what exactly does this do?
If I
mach build chrome
does it build the things I need to get everything in chrome built, or
does it build everything that depends on the chrome dir,
or both?
Axel
On 5/2/13 7:03 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
Hello dev-platform,
If you don't use mach, this messag
Hello dev-platform,
If you don't use mach, this message does not concern you. If you use
mach, in particular |mach build DIRECTORY|, keep reading.
Bug 677452 landed "smartmake-like" functionality into mach, which I have
dubbed dumbmake. smartmake (and dumbmake) [1] maintains a list of
dependen
22 matches
Mail list logo
