Re: Hash files, signature and key now missing from release directory

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Neil Harris wrote: > for example, http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.1/ Also note that the releases.mozilla.org host supports https, which offers an additional verification path. -r

Re: Binary components Firefox 45 ESR - TypeError: Components.classes[cid] is undefined

Binary components are no longer supported: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/04/dropping-support-for-binary-components/ On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if binary components still work in Firefox 45 ESR. I > have a Firefox

Re: Triage Plan for Firefox Components

This is probably a field that could stand to be re-labled, as I was blithely thinking (and I would guess others are) that it was for features, only. -- Emma On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Mark Côté wrote: > On 2016-04-07 2:50 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > > (I'd much rather

Re: Coding style for C++ enums

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Bobby Holley > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Jeff Gilbert > wrote: > >> I think the whole attempt is > >> increasingly a

Re: Triage Plan for Firefox Components

I've long thought that Bugzilla should be more like Wikipedia: the "front page" of the bug is editable and always up-to-date (i.e. not incorrect or outdated STRs), but the history and meta discussion is still available on a "back page". On 4/12/16 2:19 PM, David Lawrence wrote: I used to

Re: Hash files, signature and key now missing from release directory

On 12/04/16 17:32, Ralph Giles wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Neil Harris wrote: for example, http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.1/ Also note that the releases.mozilla.org host supports https, which offers an additional verification path.

Re: Binary components Firefox 45 ESR - TypeError: Components.classes[cid] is undefined

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 2:41:58 AM UTC+8, Bobby Holley wrote: > Binary components are no longer supported: > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/05/04/dropping-support-for-binary-components/ > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to know if binary components still work in Firefox 45 ESR. I > >

Re: Why do we still need to include Qt widget in mozilla-central?

On 2016/04/12 20:27, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central? What the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central? My understanding is that

Re: [Bug 1224726] High memory consumption when opening and searching a large Javascript file in debugger.

On 12/04/2016 01:16, Justin Dolske wrote: Looks like Gijs replied in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255526#c21, and the contributor's last comment for the day was acknowledgment that he'd stop. Yes. I got another email personally, from which it seems that they thought the

Hash files, signature and key now missing from release directory

I'm not sure if this is the right list for this, but I thought I'd better bring this to your attention. Previous release directories have carried checksum files, with signatures and a key file that allows the various binary files to be validated. See, for example,

BMO Version Upgrade Testing and Feedback Needed by May 2nd, 2016

My apologies. We will need to move this out a week to accommodate the new Firefox release on April 26th. We do not want our migration to interrupt the release process so better to do it after. More time for quality testing and feedback! :) Thanks dkl Forwarded Message