Intent to ship: "Multi-value" WebAssembly proposal

# Intent to ship: "Multi-value" WebAssembly proposal This feature adds support for WebAssembly functions that return multiple values and receive multiple return values, including across the JS/wasm call boundary. The multi-value feature also adds support for multiple results from "blocks" (a

[Intent To Close Component] Firefox :: Security: Review Requests

Hi all, as per our guidance at < https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugmasters/Projects/Bugzilla_Clean_Up> I am informing you that we are retiring the "Security: Review Request" component under Firefox. The bugzilla driven process belonged to the security team under Paul Theriault (pauljt) that has been

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Immersive Web Working Group

In case others haven't already asked... We have contributed to the content of the new charter and I would advise that Mozilla respond with support. Of course, I would be glad to hear feedback and raise it with the Immersive-Web W3C group if anyone has any concerns. Cheers, - Kip On Tue, Mar

Re: ChromeUtils.addProfilerMarker - new API to add profiler markers from JS code

I'm pretty sure that if you're not in the System Principal; your timestamps from the performance object are going to be clamped to 1ms resolution (and potentially jittered forward) I'm not sure in what context this will be used; or if there's something that would prevent this timing behavior

Re: ChromeUtils.addProfilerMarker - new API to add profiler markers from JS code

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:35 PM Tom Ritter wrote: > I'm pretty sure that if you're not in the System Principal; your > timestamps from the performance object are going to be clamped to 1ms > resolution (and potentially jittered forward) > ChromeUtils is only available to System Principal