Re: Google announces Chrome builds for Win64

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: It's also security boost for 64 bit users. Could someone please explain why you and Google claim 64bit to be more secure? This is a new argument to me and I wonder what's behind it. As stated in Google's announcement[1],

Re: How to implement XPCOM API void render(in long width, in long height, out nsIImageLoadingContent imageContent); in Javascript?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 8/22/14, 5:34 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: If I recall correctly, this is implemented as an object with a field `out` – I'm not 100% sure of the name of the field, though, so you might need to experiment. The

Re: fine-grained filtering of bugmail

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: How do I filter out all changes to the qe-verify flag? Bug 1054138 is needed before that's possible. - Ryan ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Windows 10 package manager

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Justin Dolske dol...@mozilla.com wrote: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/192950-windows-10-will-come-with-a-command-line-package-manager-much-to-the-lament-of-linux-users With Windows 10, however, we are finally getting an official package manager: OneGet.

Re: e10s is now enabled by default for Nightly!

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote: Are we currently planning to let this default ride into aurora in 2 weeks' time? From Chris's first message: e10s will not ride the trains to Aurora 36. - Ryan ___

Re: Is anyone still using JS strict warnings?

Some prior discussion of this feature happened in the platform thread Disabling strict warnings as errors in xpcshell[1]. A few people argued for the extra warnings to be removed, while one person said they were useful. No clear conclusion was reached. [1]:

Re: DevTools and Intent to Implement process

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:07 PM, J. Ryan Stinnett jry...@gmail.com wrote: The DevTools team has recently discussed[1] this, and we thought becoming more integrated in the platform Intent to Implement process would be a good thing to do. Specifically, we'd like to have a DevTools line

Re: IndexedDB transactions are no longer durable by default, and other changes

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Botond Ballo bba...@mozilla.com wrote: Have we considered issuing a warning saying that after upgrading the profile, it will not be compatible with older versions? I would really like to have something like this. WebIDE makes use of IndexedDB today, and it seems

Re: DevTools and Intent to Implement process

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Jet Villegas jville...@mozilla.com wrote: We've started implementing the Web Animations API [1] with very early collaboration with the Dev Tools team and have seen very promising results. Is that a model we can continue to follow or modify to suit? While I was

Re: Rust and Servo training sessions at Whistler

On Sched, it appears the Servo session is scheduled for Friday, 1 - 3 PM, is that now the correct date and time? - Ryan On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Lars Bergstrom larsb...@mozilla.com wrote: Jim, We won’t get into anything that requires prior Rust experience during the Servo session -

Re: Overview of what you can do with Telemetry

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/10/2015 11:25 PM, Vladan Djeric wrote: Intern presentation schedule: https://mana.mozilla.org/wiki/display/globalstaffing/2015+Intern+Presentations Nothing public? Here's a public PDF snapshot[1] of the current contents.

Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

The DevTools team is planning to move our code out of /browser/devtools and /toolkit/devtools and into a new top level /devtools directory. The main goals of this are to reduce confusion for new DevTools contributors and help us better organize our work in the future. It will also aid future

Re: Intent to implement: Moving DevTools to top level /devtools directory

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Paul Rouget p...@mozilla.com wrote: I guess by moving things to /devtools/, you also want to update the URLs to chrome://devtools/content. So then, we can compile and open the devtools with non-firefox builds (thunderbird, b2g, seamonkey, ...). But if the

Re: New heap snapshots tool in the developer tools

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Wilson Page wrote: > I assume we can use it via the WebIDE Devtools? Yes, indeed you can! I just tried it on Aries to be sure. :) You will need a recent device build that includes Gecko rev 601528a16cf9 from 2015-10-29. I used the Aries

Re: mach mozregression command

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Benoit Girard wrote: > I just > hope that we continue to maintain mozregression as a standalone tool and > that this wrapper doesn't cause us to miss regressions in it. The mach wrapper essentially just calls "pip install mozregression"[1]

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > Note that enabling a FFOS-oriented API like mozbrowser has the effect of > turning it on for web content (with some set of permissions) rather than > "for chrome", since that's how things work in FFOS. So any work to

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

I have filed bug 1238160 to investigate and hopefully enable mozbrowser on desktop Firefox. - Ryan On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:23 PM, J. Ryan Stinnett <jry...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Note that enablin

Re: unowned orange by team

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Ben Kelly wrote: > > devtools: > 21) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=992275 > 22) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1210208 > 23) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230031 > 29)

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote: > What prevents you from using ? Is it because the parent > frame is (X)HTML? Placing a regular, non-remote in the HTML page does work. However, does not work in my specific context according to the policy of

Re: HTML-based chrome and

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up. Will this be available to all chrome privileged > code (i.e. not behind a mozApp permission)? If so, this could be a great > starting point for what I'm describing. The main differences being

Re: HTML-based chrome and

We'll soon have access to in desktop Firefox (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1238160). I realize you are proposing a different API than mozbrowser, but I just wanted to point out that there will be some HTML-based approach for browser chrome available on desktop soon. - Ryan

Re: now available on desktop Firefox

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM, J. Ryan Stinnett <jry...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By default, can't access the storage used by > > for cookies and other site data, making it hard to share

now available on desktop Firefox

Do you like HTML? Do you like to build core browsing UI for desktop Firefox? Now you can have both together! In more detail, is now enabled[1] on desktop Firefox. This makes it possible to create frames for displaying web content (similar to a ) from HTML chrome pages. This is the same system

Re: Tier-1 for Linux 64 Debug builds in TaskCluster on March 14 (and more!)

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > 2. I cannot retrigger any TC task. > > This is pretty annoying when I was debugging intermittent issues. Hopefully > they could get fix before we migrate all Linux builds to TaskCluster, > otherwise we will lose the

Re: Readable Bug Statuses in Bugzilla

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > You can see this in bmo if you have the new/modal/experimental UI enabled ( > https://bugzillatips.wordpress.com/2015/08/07/new-modal-ui-for-show_bug-on-bmo/ > ) . Kind of a side note, but do we intend to make

Re: Deprecating XUL in new UI

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Dave Townsend wrote: > * iframe elements don't have the same capabilities that the XUL browser > element does and we use that in some UI. We do have available to chrome pages on desktop now (bug 1238160[1], landed in Firefox 47), which

Re: Deprecating XUL in new UI

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM, smaug wrote: > On 01/16/2017 10:43 PM, Dave Townsend wrote: >> >> One of the things I've been investigating since moving back to the desktop >> team is how we can remove XUL from the application as much as possible. >> The >> benefits for doing

Re: mach and ccache failure?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Andrew McCreight wrote: > I'm not sure of the particulars, but I believe ccache doesn't share the > results between two object directories unless you set it up explicitly to > use relative paths. Or something like that. > >

Re: Switching to async/await from Task.jsm/yield

For modules that have already converted, is there any performance change (good or bad) between async / await vs. Task? - Ryan On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:29:15PM -0700, Dave Townsend wrote: > >> Writing code in

Re: Startup JS debugging (sometimes) possible via Browser Toolbox

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Panos Astithas wrote: > You almost completely resolved the 4-year-old bug 814298, yay! I now > wonder if this makes it easier to improve mochitest debugging per bug > 929535. Thanks for the pointers to these bugs. Bug 814298 stills needs

Re: Startup JS debugging (sometimes) possible via Browser Toolbox

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Jared Wein wrote: > Yes, we support watches in the new debugger UI now. The new debugger UI is > used by default in the Browser Content Toolbox, and it is pretty nice and > shiny. New debugger UI is on for Browser Content Toolbox, but at the

Re: disabled non-e10s tests on trunk

I think Ben's argument has merit: 1. Even after Firefox 57, we will still be shipping a product in non-e10s mode: Firefox for Android 2. If WPT (and potentially other suites) aren't being run in non-e10s mode, it increases risk because we are shipping untested code paths to our users Someone

Re: Removing "MathML View Source" menu item? [was: Can we remove nsIEntityConverter?]

As an occasional contributor to view source, I think it would be nice to remove the MathML support from m-c like you are proposing, as it definitely increased the maintenance burden when we reworked view source into a tab a while ago, and my assumption is the usage of MathML view source is

Re: Canonical cinnabar repository

There are also some details about MozReview with git-cinnabar at: http://mozilla-version-control-tools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/mozreview/install-git.html though it doesn't seem to appear in the contents sidebar on the left, so it would be nice to make it more discoverable. (Though I suppose

Stylo now the default configuration for mozilla-central

Assuming bug 1330412 sticks, Stylo will be the default configuration for mozilla-central for all platforms except Android. Thanks to everyone involved with Stylo that helped us reach this stage! Nightly users should not notice much change, since there was already an active experiment that

Rust logging with e10s

If you've used RUST_LOG to enable logging for Rust modules, but were hoping you could filter down to child processes only, bug 1390736 now allows you to use RUST_LOG_CHILD to target them. This has been helpful for several of us working on Stylo. To use, just replace RUST_LOG with RUST_LOG_CHILD

Re: We need better canaries for JS code

This may not be what you want here, but just so you are aware of the option... You can use `Services.console.registerListener`[1] in a test harness, etc. to hear messages logged to the console. The harness could count messages of a certain type (like script errors) and fail the test if there's an

Re: Intent to ship: Retained Display Lists

How is the AIL metric defined? I looked around Hasal for a bit, but I didn't see a clear definition. Is it similar to RAIL[1], or something entirely different? [1]: https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rail - Ryan On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Shako Ho

Re: Intent to move Activity Stream into its own process

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:20 PM Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > If it *would* mean a process switch, we may want to take another look at > some of the bugs relating to those (process switches are currently > relatively rare) and re-prioritize them. > I am not sure about the specific AS work here, but

Re: Intent to unship: "storage" attribute in options for indexedDB.open()

DevTools is one chrome caller that might be impacted. We craft a custom principal and pass `storage: persistent`[1] when using IndexedDB in the tools. DevTools uses this storage for developer settings that should be retained over time. It sounds like with the proposed change here, DevTools

Feature Removed: View Source in new window

me know here or elsewhere so that it can be prioritized. [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1203624#c11 Thanks, J. Ryan Stinnett ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: mozilla-central Fails to Build on Mac With Latest Xcode (10.0)

The Xcode 10 Release Notes[1] in the "Command Line Tools" heading suggests that future versions will not provide a *.pkg to install headers to /usr/include, so we may want to adjust whichever build steps depend on this location. [1]:

Re: What is dom/browser-element/ used for?

Yes, it's currently used for Responsive Design Mode in DevTools. I believe that is the only place it's used in the tree today. - Ryan On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 12:24, Henri Sivonen wrote: > I think I found a user in dev tools: > >

Re: Intent to prototype: re-enabling SharedArrayBuffer

On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 12:48, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Note that SharedArrayBuffer itself is already enabled by default as > ECMAScript (JavaScript) was never changed. And that standard requires > a host to allow cross-thread usage as while it describes > infrastructure for threads (agents) it