Hi,
According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop. This
is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping packets
keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database gets bigger,
query times get worse, etc. We need to decide on what data we can throw
On 9/19/2012 7:04 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
A while ago (I think more than a couple of years ago now), Vlad
implemented FunctionTimer which is a facility to time how much each
function exactly takes to run. Then, I went ahead and instrumented a
whole bunch of code which was triggered
On 10/11/2012 1:34 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:26:33PM -0400, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
On 10/11/2012 02:33 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:57:53PM -0400, Justin Lebar wrote:
By turning off Linux PGO testing, you really mean stop making and
On 10/17/2012 6:55 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
Following the recent discussion about PGO, I really wanted to understand what benefits
PGO gives Firefox on Windows, if any--I was skeptical. Rafael (IIRC) posted some Talos
numbers, but I didn't know how to interpret them. So I decided to try a few
On 11/13/2012 3:53 PM, Alex Keybl wrote:
If the Snappy initiative (or any other group of Mozillians) has short-term
plans to evangelize the perf wins of PGO to Linux distros, I agree that we
should leave PGO builds and testing enabled on Linux and further investigate
the mysterious crash in
Justin Lebar wrote:
It sounds to me like people want both
1) Easier access to aggregated data so they can build their own
dashboards roughly comparable in features to the current dashboards.
I doubt people actually want to build own dashboards. I suspect this is
mainly a need because of
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Taras Glek schrieb:
I doubt people actually want to build own dashboards. I suspect this is
mainly a need because of deficiencies in the current dashboard.
I disagree. I think people will want to integrate Telemetry data in
dashboards that connect data from different
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:51:18PM -0400, Justin Lebar wrote:
I think we should consider using much less JS in the parts of Gecko that are
used in B2G. I'd like us to consider writing new modules in C++ where
possible, and I'd like us to consider rewriting existing modules
So there is no general 'good for performance' way of doing IO.
However I think most people who need this need to write small bits of
data and there is a good way to do that.
Gregory Szorc wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion about the state of storage in Gecko.
Currently when you are
What is the problem with current population size? We are not as small as
Android on desktop channels :)
Chris Peterson wrote:
(Sorry if this is not the right forum for this discussion.)
To increase our testing populations, I'd like to suggest that we add a
periodic channel upsell message to
Hi,
Browsers are a competitive field. We need to move faster. Eliminating
review lag is an obvious step in the right direction.
I believe good code review is essential for shipping a good browser.
Conversely, poor code review practices hold us back. I am really
frustrated with how many
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/9/13 9:59 PM, therealbrendane...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that's what I meant. How else could one respond within a day?
Some of the within a day proposals have suggested that it include
weekends, fwiw.
Ok. Does this need to go on wiki.m.o or MDN somewhere (not that
L. David Baron wrote:
[ responding to the two months worth flood of email that just
resulted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=891906 ]
On Tuesday 2013-07-09 12:14 -0700, Taras Glek wrote:
a) Realize that reviewing code is more valuable than writing code as
it results
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Do we have a formalized way to do A/B testing with telemetry? That is,
assuming that there is a telemetry probe that measures problem
symptoms and a boolean pref for turning on a potential solution, is
there a way the declare the pref as something that telemetry queries
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:39:59PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Incidentally, in those two weeks, I did two attempts at building
without unified sources, resulting in me filing 4 bugs in different
modules for problems caused by 6 different landings[1]. I think it is time
to
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/2/2013, 2:26 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:39:59PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Incidentally, in those two weeks, I did two attempts at building
without unified sources, resulting in me filing 4 bugs in different
modules
Hi,
A few people noticed that we do not have a nice, searchable knowledge
base for Gecko tech. We have places to ask questions such as various
newsgroups, irc and places to document things like the wikis. It is hard
to search through all of that, so questions get repeated.
Lets give
Gave some karma out. Thanks
Benoit Girard mailto:bgir...@mozilla.com
Tuesday, February 4, 2014 14:49
I notice that right now we need 5 karma to up vote so there's a bit of
a catch-22 for the up voting to start. I think right now it's up to
the admin to get a pool of users to break the
that's pretty, but where did the list of classes class members go when
viewing files like
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/modules/libjar/nsZipArchive.cpp
- Original Message -
From: Erik Rose e...@mozilla.com
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org,
the bumps!
Erik
Taras Glek mailto:tg...@mozilla.com
Friday, February 7, 2014 14:42
that's pretty, but where did the list of classes class members go
when viewing files like
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/modules/libjar/nsZipArchive.cpp
- Original Message
firebot can do rss feeds, how to
update it, etc. Can anyone help get some firebot integration?
Taras
Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 2/4/14, 3:33 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Taras Glek tg...@mozilla.com wrote:
A few people noticed that we do not have a nice
*User Repos*
TLDR: I would like to make user repos read-only by April 30th. We should
archive them by May 31st.
Time spent operating user repositories could be spent reducing our
end-to-end continuous integration cycles. These do not seem like
mission-critical repos, seems like developers
Gregory Szorc mailto:g...@mozilla.com
Wednesday, March 26, 2014 17:40
On 3/26/14, 4:53 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
*User Repos*
TLDR: I would like to make user repos read-only by April 30th. We should
archive them by May 31st.
Time spent operating user repositories could be spent reducing our
end
Also, if you are using a COW filesystem, initial clones should be nearly
free and you'd only pay the extra copy cost for changesets added afterwards.
This could help dramatically with mozilla-central clones.
Out of curiosity, is there open source software for a shared Git object
store?
git.
Ed Morley wrote:
(Follow-ups to dev.tree-management please)
Hi all :-)
The vast majority of mozilla-central landings are now via curated merges
from integration/team repositories. This dramatically increases the
chance that the tip of mozilla-central is in a known-good state, meaning
that:
Thanks Dan. This looks to be contributing roughly half to our 30-45%
build speedup on Windows this month.
Daniel Minor wrote:
Hello,
Just a heads up that very soon we'll be removing jit-tests from the make check target[1]. The
tests have been split out into a separate test job on TBPL[2]
Hi,
https://ask.mozilla.org/questions/ is now ssl-enabled(old news) and
features persona support(as of today).
Taras
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-05-21, 5:15 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 5/21/14, 1:51 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
Or, alternatively, attempt to automate this with Autoland
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657828).
Is anyone actively working on Autoland? Rail had been working on
28 matches
Mail list logo
