On 08/24/2012 02:42 AM, Neil wrote:
Justin Lebar wrote:
So now you can do
nsCOMPtrnsIFoo foo;
int32_t f = foo-GetFoo();
Why was I expecting this to be Foo()? (Perhaps unreasonably.)
Yeah, it should be Foo().
File a bug?
I rejected the first approach because it meant that every
On 10/11/2012 02:40 PM, Paul Rouget wrote:
Context: in the firefox devtools, we need to track some nodes and update
different views based on what's happening to this node (show its parents,
show its child, show its attributes, …).
The new Mutation observers are very helpful. But there's one
On 10/11/2012 07:55 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a charter for a new Pointer Events
Working Group. For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Sep/0017.html
http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/charter/charter-proposed.html
Mozilla has the
Hi all,
I just landed the patch for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=818739
in order to speed up
shutdown times. Shutdown cycle collections are still run in debug builds so
that we can
detect leaks. Also, one can set XPCOM_CC_RUN_DURING_SHUTDOWN env variable to
enable
shutdown
On 12/15/2012 12:31 AM, smaug wrote:
Hi all,
I just landed the patch for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=818739
in order to speed up
shutdown times. Shutdown cycle collections are still run in debug builds so
that we can
detect leaks. Also, one can set
On 12/27/2012 12:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
We have a bunch of chrome and extension code that does things like instanceof
HTMLAnchorElement (and likewise with other DOM interfaces).
The problem is that per WebIDL spec and general ECMAScript sanity this
shouldn't work: instanceof goes up the
On 01/31/2013 10:37 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the above, I'd like to propose the following long-term solutions:
1. Disable PGO/LTCG now.
2. Try to delay disabling PGO/LTCG as much as possible.
3. Try to
On 02/02/2013 11:37 AM, rvj wrote:
Its been a couple of years since Ive used the Mozilla libraries and some of the
functionality now seems iffy
For example print preview requests now generate an invalid pointer error
error[Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80004003
On 02/14/2013 05:48 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
On what OSes? Windows by default coalesces mouse move events. They are
like WM_PAINT events in that they are only delivered when the event queue
is empty. See
On 02/26/2013 01:18 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 02/25/2013 01:57 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
We clone static copies of documents for print preview. We could
potentially
do the same for normal printing, I'd think.
I'm almost certain that we already do. (smaug would know for sure)
We clone
On 02/25/2013 11:28 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 2/25/2013 4:14 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
The current thinking is that we need *some* indication that a print job is in
progress, because we need to prevent the user from closing the tab or
window until the print job has been completely handed
On 03/04/2013 08:20 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 3/4/13 1:08 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
It only needs to be certain of seeing the event despite anything content
can do,
In that case, a capturing handler on the chrome event listener will work fine.
-Boris
or capturing or bubbling event
On 04/18/2013 03:50 PM, Jim Mathies wrote:
We have quite a few issues with touch enabled sites on Windows. [1] Our support
for touch stretches back to when we first implemented MozTouch events
which over time has morphed into a weird combination of W3C touch / simple
gestures support. It is
On 04/23/2013 04:07 PM, Tom Schuster wrote:
At the moment it's really just Jono working full time on this, and
terrence and other people reviewing. This stuff is actually quite easy
and you can expect really fast review times from our side.
In some parts of the code rooting could literally just
On 05/06/2013 05:46 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
Let me just reply to a few points to keep this conversation manageable:
2013/5/5 p.krautzber...@gmail.com
Here are a couple of reasons why dropping MathML would be a bad idea.
(While I wrote this others made some of the points as well.)
* MathML is
On 07/09/2013 03:14 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
Hi,
Browsers are a competitive field. We need to move faster. Eliminating review
lag is an obvious step in the right direction.
I believe good code review is essential for shipping a good browser.
Conversely, poor code review practices hold us back. I
On 07/27/2013 06:06 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
On 27/07/2013 2:53 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
...
Whether or not we totally succeed in this endeavor is another question
entirely. You could instrument your build to count the number of live
nsFrameMessageManager objects and report the number of
On 08/30/2013 10:48 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
The assertions that we have to catch refcounting objects on the wrong
thread are now fatal in opt builds. This change is scoped to the nightly
channel to avoid performance penalties on builds that are widely used, and
will not propagate to aurora. See
for this?
Yes, please. CC me
-Olli :smaug
Honza
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 09/18/2013 10:55 PM, Luke Wagner wrote:
To save typing, the JS engine has typedefs like typedef HandleJSObject*
HandleObject; typedef RootedJS::Value RootedValue; and the official
style is to prefer the HandleX/RootedX typedefs when there is no need to use the
HandleX/RootedX template-ids
- Clicking on macros seem to lead to some results, but definitely not the one
I'd expect -
the definition of the macro.
- Trying to find files is hard. (Still haven't figured out how to get easily
from the main page to Navigator.cpp on dom/base)
- cycleCollection on the right side may or
On 10/17/2013 12:09 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I'd like to write a patch to kill Moz Audio Data in Firefox 28 in favor of
Web Audio. We added a deprecation warning for this API in Firefox 23 (bug
855570). I'm not sure what our usual process for this kind of thing is,
should we just take the
On 11/01/2013 07:55 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
I have (slightly optimistically) started writing a post-mortem of this
closure, analyzing what went wrong and why, and how we might avoid it
in the future:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/mEB0H50ZjX
FWIW, I added the following TL;DR to the
Hi all,
the recent OOM cases have been really annoying. They have slowed down
development, even for those who
haven't been dealing with the actual issue(s).
Could we handle this kind of cases differently. Perhaps clone the bad state of
m-i to
some other repository we're tracking using tbpl,
On 11/21/2013 09:43 PM, Laura Thomson wrote:
I'll keep it short and to the point. Are there any objections to shutting down
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsqueryform.cgi ?
If you don't know what that is--and few people do, which is even more reason to
shut it off--it's a search engine for some
On 11/21/2013 10:15 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
It would be good to explore alternatives to Bonsai.
https://github.com/mozilla/mozilla-central is supposed to have full
CVS history, right?
Some concerns with that alternative:
- I think that repo misses some history from some branches of CVS
- I'm not
Hi all and FYI
unified build mode has increased memory usage of building with gcc
significantly.
On my laptop (8 gig mem) I started to see some swapping, and because of that
build times with unified mode weren't that much better than before.
But now, finally there is a use case for clang - it
or
paint requests).
I do expect some tp regressions but significant tp_responsiveness improvements.
(I'll need to still fix few racy tests before landing)
-smaug
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=930793
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732621
[3] https
On 12/10/2013 11:28 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
Hi All,
Can we start using C++ STL containers like std::set, std::map, std::queue in
Mozilla code please? Many of the STL containers are more convenient to
use than our equivalents, and more familiar to new contributors.
I understand that we used to
On 12/20/2013 12:11 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/19/2013, 12:57 PM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
I think we should do more than encourage: we should back out for all
style guide violations. Period. We could even enforce that during upload
to a review tool, perhaps.
However. This has to be done
Sounds good, and I'd include also js/* so that we had consistent style
everywhere.
It is rather painful to hack various non-js/* and js/* (xpconnect in my case)
in the same patch.
(I also happen to think that Mozilla coding style is inherently better than js
style, since
it has clear rules for
point if
someone wants to do the leg work.
bholley
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:07 AM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote:
Sounds good, and I'd include also js/* so that we had consistent style
everywhere.
It is rather painful to hack various non-js/* and js/* (xpconnect in my
case)
in the same patch.
(I
On 01/07/2014 01:38 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 1/6/2014 4:27 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
That's just not true, sorry. If some module owner decides to keep using NULL or
PRUnichar, or invent their own string class, they will be corrected.
Maybe. But we also have a very large number of
On 11/22/2013 10:18 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
With the landing of bug 672843, the NS_ENSURE_* macros are now considered
deprecated. If you are writing code that wants to issue warnings when
methods fail, please either use NS_WARNING directly or use the new NS_WARN_IF
macro.
if
On 01/07/2014 02:58 AM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
smaug sm...@welho.com writes:
Why this deprecation?
NS_ENSURE_ macros hid return paths.
Also many people didn't understand that they issued warnings, and
so used the macros for expected return paths.
Was there some useful functionality
On 01/07/2014 02:46 AM, Jeff Walden wrote:
I'm writing this list, so obviously I'm choosing what I think is on it. But I
think there's rough consensus on most of these among JS hackers.
JS widely uses 99ch line lengths (allows a line-wrap character in 100ch
terminals). Given C++ symbol
On 01/07/2014 05:14 PM, smaug wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:46 AM, Bobby Holley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:04 PM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote:
no, since it is always possible to expand those macros.
However
if (NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(rv)) {
return rv;
}
is super ugly.
Note
On 01/07/2014 08:46 AM, Bobby Holley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:04 PM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote:
no, since it is always possible to expand those macros.
However
if (NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(rv)) {
return rv;
}
is super ugly.
Note that there in a explicit stylistic exception
On 02/13/2014 12:53 PM, Girish Sharma wrote:
Thank you everyone for your inputs. Since there is no current method of
precisely tracking window creation and removal, how should I proceed and
add such functionality ?
What I basically want is that despite of BFCache or anything, I should be
able
On 03/18/2014 11:26 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
CSS Variables is a feature that allows authors to define custom properties that
cascade and inherit in the same way that regular properties do, and to
reference the values of these custom properties in the values of regular
properties (and other
On 03/20/2014 01:39 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
Followup to dev-platform please.
We are discovering a lot of leaks in JS implemented DOM objects. The
general pattern seems to be that we have a DOM object that also needs
to listen to events from the message manager or notifications from the
observer
On 03/20/2014 01:58 AM, smaug wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:39 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
Followup to dev-platform please.
We are discovering a lot of leaks in JS implemented DOM objects. The
general pattern seems to be that we have a DOM object that also needs
to listen to events from the message
On 03/20/2014 02:25 AM, smaug wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:58 AM, smaug wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:39 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
Followup to dev-platform please.
We are discovering a lot of leaks in JS implemented DOM objects. The
general pattern seems to be that we have a DOM object that also needs
about cycles,
but if this is necessary, I could rework it in something a bit
faster/more robust.
Cheers,
David
On 3/20/14 1:25 AM, smaug wrote:
And we could add a flag to WrappedJS so that it would call some callback
when it is about
to go away. That would let cleanup of WeakPromise happen asap
On 03/27/2014 10:26 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
This sounds like a worthy and interesting idea, but also a very difficult one.
PC games allow the user to turn certain features (mostly graphics
related ones) on and off so that they can find their own level of
acceptable performance/quality.
refresh rate in some cases in order to try to avoid
extra layout flushes etc.
--Jet
- Original Message -
From: smaug sm...@welho.com
To: Nicholas Nethercote n.netherc...@gmail.com, Jet Villegas
j...@mozilla.com
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 11:16:42 AM
Subject: Re: Graceful Platform
On 03/29/2014 02:55 PM, Paolo Amadini wrote:
With bug 988122 landing soon, you'll now find a Promise object
available by default in the global scope of JavaScript modules.
However, this default implementation is still limited, and you're
strongly recommended to import Promise.jsm explicitly in
On 04/14/2014 12:42 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
I came across the following articles on source control and code review:
* https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabflavor/article/
recommendations_on_revision_control/
*
On 08/12/2014 06:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, the only downside in replacing already_AddRefed by
nsCOMPtr would be to incur more useless calls to AddRef and Release. In the
case of threadsafe i.e.
On 08/13/2014 07:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you do the following instead?
unused MyFunction(); // I know that I'm leaking this ref, but it's ok
somehow
No, because the use-case is where you don't want to
What would be the event types for touchpad events?
We must not add yet another types of events to handle pointer type of events.
And besides, touch event model is rather horrible, so if we for some strange
reason need
totally new events, I'd prefer using something closer to pointer events.
If we just needs new coordinates, couldn't we extend the existing event
interfaces with some new properties?
-Olli
On 09/12/2014 12:52 AM, smaug wrote:
What would be the event types for touchpad events?
We must not add yet another types of events to handle pointer type of events
On 09/11/2014 08:26 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 9/11/14 3:49 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, at 18:26, Ms2ger wrote:
First of all, you neglected to explain the standardization situation
here. Is this feature being standardized? If not, why not? How do
other browser vendors feel
On 10/31/2014 02:21 AM, smaug wrote:
Intent to ship is too strong for this.
We need to first have implementation landed and tested ;)
I wouldn't ship the implementation in desktop FF without plenty of more testing.
But I guess the question is what people think about shipping the pocketspinx
Intent to ship is too strong for this.
We need to first have implementation landed and tested ;)
I wouldn't ship the implementation in desktop FF without plenty of more testing.
-Olli
On 10/31/2014 01:18 AM, Andre Natal wrote:
I've been researching speech recognition in Firefox for two
Hi all,
looks like Zoom profiler[1] is now free.
It has rather good UI on top of oprofile/rrprofile making profiling quite easy.
I've found it easier to use than Gecko profiler and it gives different kinds of
views to the same
data. However it does lack the JS specific bits Gecko profiler has.
On 11/13/2014 08:01 PM, smaug wrote:
Hi all,
looks like Zoom profiler[1] is now free.
It has rather good UI on top of oprofile/rrprofile
perf/oprofile/rrprofile
making profiling quite easy.
I've found it easier to use than Gecko profiler and it gives different kinds of
views to the same
://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Performance/Profiling_with_Zoom
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:03 PM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 08:01 PM, smaug wrote:
Hi all,
looks like Zoom profiler[1] is now free.
It has rather good UI on top of oprofile/rrprofile
perf/oprofile/rrprofile
making
On 11/25/2014 05:45 PM, Reuben Morais wrote:
On Nov 25, 2014, at 13:22, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/11/2014 14:22, rayna...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to get the audio sample data and do some math on it, then play it in the
speaker, with the minimum of latency (arround
On 12/26/2014 03:08 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com wrote:
Possible solutions would be to:
- remove implicit conversions to T*
If this were done, I think we should change the calling convention for
functions that take pointers
On 03/28/2015 02:32 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
On 03/27/2015 11:51 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Mats Palmgren m...@mozilla.com wrote:
So let's change the project-wide coding rules instead to allow 99
columns as the hard limit, but keep 80 columns as the
penalty. But this is false.
Can we somehow make use of nsDependentString easier? (not that I think it is
hard. The name is just a bit long)
-Olli
-Jeff
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:04 PM, smaug sm...@welho.com wrote:
On 03/02/2015 01:11 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Boris
On 02/28/2015 05:25 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
Oh, another issue is that I've followed the spec and made offsetX/Y
doubles, whereas
On 03/02/2015 01:11 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/1/15 5:04 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
Hence I think we should remove this method. All callees should use either
AssignLiteral(MOZ_UTF16(some string)), or, if don't want to bloat
On 04/23/2015 07:43 AM, Ed Morley wrote:
Scrolling fluidity/general app responsiveness of Treeherder is massively
worse in Nightly compared to Chrome. eg try this in both:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-central
The problem is even more noticeable when the get next 50 buttons
On 01/16/2015 04:31 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2015-01-06 15:14 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C recently published the following proposed recommendation (the
stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation):
http://www.w3.org/TR/pointerevents/
Pointer Events
There's a call for
On 04/24/2015 08:57 PM, Matt Brubeck wrote:
tl;dr:
We plan to enable Pointer Events for mouse and pen input in Firefox Nightly
builds within the next few weeks.
Background:
Pointer Events is a W3C recommendation that defines new DOM events for unified
handling of mouse, touch, and pen
On 04/10/2015 09:09 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
On Apr 10, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to propose that we should ban the usage of refcounted objects
inside lambdas in Gecko. Here is the reason:
Consider the following code:
nsINode* myNode;
On 06/05/2015 12:06 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 06/04/2015 01:18 PM, smaug wrote:
More likely we need to change a small number of noisy NS_ENSURE_* macro
users to use something else,
and keep most of the NS_ENSURE_* usage as it is.
I agree -- I posted about switching to something opt
Hi all,
there was some discussion in #developers about use of 'auto' earlier today.
Some people seem to like it, and some, like I, don't.
The reasons why I try to avoid using it and usually ask to replace it with the
actual type when I'm
reviewing a patch using it are:
- It makes the code
On 06/09/2015 05:17 PM, Neil Deakin wrote:
In bug 1162050, we'd like to remove support for the old non-standard drag
events, which were left in for a period of compatibility.
yes please. Anything we can do to simplify dnd code is good.
-Olli
The 'draggesture' event should be replaced
On 06/04/2015 01:07 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Part of my world domination plans are to turn warnings into something
that causes test to actually fail (see bug 1080457 co). Would you like
to join forces?
Turning warnings into failures sounds odd (but bug 1080457 seems to be actually
On 06/04/2015 09:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
Usually I use NS_WARNING to mean something weird and unexpected is
happening, e.g. a bug in Web page code, but not necessarily a browser bug.
Sometimes I get useful hints
On 06/18/2015 03:37 PM, Frederik Braun wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to do a little analysis of FxOS Gaia to identify instances
of innerHTML assignments at runtime[1]. I am hoping this gives me a more
precise number about hot paths (in contrast to just looking at the
source code).
What kind of
What is the context where the scripts would run? In the page or something more
like a TabChildGlobal (the child side of a message manager)
but without chrome privileges?
On 06/16/2015 06:24 PM, Paul Rouget wrote:
In bug 1174733, I'm proposing a patch to implement the equivalent of
Google's
On 06/02/2015 11:56 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 06/02/2015 12:58 PM, smaug wrote:
So, I'd like to understand why people think 'auto' is a good thing to use.
(bz mentioned it having some use inside bindings' codegenerator, and
sure, I can see that being rather
valid case.)
One common auto
On 06/02/2015 11:56 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 06/02/2015 12:58 PM, smaug wrote:
So, I'd like to understand why people think 'auto' is a good thing to use.
(bz mentioned it having some use inside bindings' codegenerator, and
sure, I can see that being rather
valid case.)
One common auto
On 07/03/2015 10:27 AM, mihai.slavcov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an SWT application that uses a browser to display HTML pages. Latest SWT
4.5 now support XulRunner v31, but something has changed: zoom is not working
anymore. It was working before with SWT 4.4 and XulRunner v10.
I have no
On 07/05/2015 06:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
is busy with one thing or another (e.g. networking).
They'd like to use this to avoid having to create
On 07/06/2015 10:33 PM, Zibi Braniecki wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about MO behavior.
From what I understand, MutationObserver API is designed in a way that is
supposed to guarantee two things that I need:
1) That if I have a MO set on the document during readyState=loading, then all
As someone who spends more than 50% of working time doing reviews I'm strongly
against this proposal.
aFoo helps with readability - reader knows immediately when the code is dealing
with arguments.
-Olli
On 07/07/2015 06:12 AM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
I propose that we stop recommending the
Hi bholley,
looks great, but a question
The example
mProducer-RequestFoo()
-Then(mThread, __func__,
[...] (ResolveType aVal) { ... },
[...] (RejectType aVal) { ... });
uses C++ lambdas. Do we have some static analysis or such in place to protect
that
On 08/15/2015 10:24 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
The W3C is proposing revised charters for:
Web Platform Working Group:
http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html
yes, please!
On 06/30/2015 06:46 AM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Target release: Firefox 41
Implementation and shipping bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=916893
Specification: https://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/
Gecko already implements support for the
with readability,
but I can live with use of auto there.)
-Olli
On 06/02/2015 10:58 PM, smaug wrote:
Hi all,
there was some discussion in #developers about use of 'auto' earlier today.
Some people seem to like it, and some, like I, don't.
The reasons why I try to avoid using it and usually ask
On 08/02/2015 01:47 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Hubert Figuière h...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 02/08/15 04:55 AM, smaug wrote:
A new type of error 'auto' seems to cause, now seen on m-i, is
auto foo
On 08/02/2015 02:34 PM, Hubert Figuière wrote:
On 02/08/15 07:17 AM, smaug wrote:
Probably we should generally avoid using constructor directly for
those cases. Instead, use helper functions like MakeUnique() or
MakeAndAddRef(), which is much safer.
MakeAndAddRef would have the same problem
On 07/27/2015 04:07 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2015-07-27 5:35 AM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Is anything done between crashtests to clean up memory use?
There isn't, AFAIK.
Or can CC be triggered to run during or after a particular crashtest?
You can use SimpleTest.forceGC/CC() as needed.
On 07/15/2015 10:42 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
Hi,
We intend to un-prefix HTMLMediaElement.srcObject (it currently exists as
HTMLMediaElement.mozSrcObject), even though it only supports a subset of the
types mandated in the spec. [1]
It is a bit unfortunate to expose the property without
On 07/13/2015 01:50 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
is busy with one thing or another
On 07/14/2015 08:11 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
That being said, every other organizations in the world is using the same
or similar tools and is faced with similar challenges. Lack of a
commit-skipping feature doesn't hinder
On 10/26/2015 10:21 AM, Amit Zur wrote:
MDN says keyCode is deprecated and web developers should favor `key` instead.
But sendKeyEvent doesn't support key property on the event.
I found bug #1214993 but the solution there is a workaround for the home button
for TV.
Can we expect this to be
On 10/09/2015 03:46 AM, zbranie...@mozilla.com wrote:
We're about to start working on another API for the next Firefox OS, this time
for DOM Intl, that will operate on `data-intl-format`,
`data-intl-value` and `data-intl-options`.
It would be much easier for us to keep l10n and intl separately
On 07/07/2015 10:55 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 7/7/2015 21:27, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'm strongly against removing the prefix. I got used to this
On 07/07/2015 11:45 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
Removing the style guide for “prefix function arguments with a” will not
preclude people from naming a variable aFoo. At least the current style guide
precludes people from naming non-function arguments that way, albeit indirectly.
I’m trying
On 07/08/2015 04:05 AM, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
Jeff encouraged me to add more things to this thread, so I’m blaming him. So,
some random thoughts.
After getting paid to write code for 20+ years and then showing up at Mozilla,
and seeing the a prefix, I thought “this is brilliant, how come
Do you actually have any data how many % of Gecko devs would prefer not using
aFoo?
I mean it makes no sense to change to foo, if most of the devs prefer aFoo.
Similarly I would stop objecting the change if majority of the devs say
yes, please change this coding style which Mozilla has had
On 07/07/2015 11:34 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
Outvars are good candidates for having markings in the variable name.
`aFoo` for all arguments is a poor solution for this, though.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:22 PM, smaug opet...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 07/07/2015 11:18 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
On Tue
On 09/15/2015 06:53 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 9/15/15 11:11 AM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
I'm pretty sure https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev has full history.
Though note that it doesn't have working blame for a lot of files in our source
tree (and especially the ones you'd _want_ to get blame
On 09/11/2015 04:53 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2015-09-08 17:33 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Follow-up on this, since we now have two days remaining to respond to these
proposed charters.
If you still have strong opinions about the proposed Web Platform and Timed
Media Working Groups
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
