Hi Lawrence,
The team is saying we do not know him, but I've raised this to Andrei and
Alexandra to provide him some guidance.
Regards,
Florin.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Lawrence Mandel
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, 11 April 2016, Mike Taylor wrote:
>
On 12/04/2016 01:16, Justin Dolske wrote:
Looks like Gijs replied in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255526#c21, and the
contributor's last comment for the day was acknowledgment that he'd stop.
Yes. I got another email personally, from which it seems that they
thought the
He seems to have gotten the message:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255526#c21
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Mark Côté wrote:
> Tagging the comments as spam will autoban the account after a certain
> number. It will also autocollapse the comments.
>
> Mark
>
On 4/11/16 4:06 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
On Monday, 11 April 2016, Mike Taylor wrote:
On 4/11/16 5:04 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
He touched 283 bugs in the last 48 hours, most of which are FIXED.
If anyone in the QA org reads this list, maybe they could reach out and
On Monday, 11 April 2016, Mike Taylor wrote:
> On 4/11/16 5:04 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
>
>> He touched 283 bugs in the last 48 hours, most of which are FIXED.
>>
>
> If anyone in the QA org reads this list, maybe they could reach out and
> teach him how to more effectively
On 4/11/16 5:04 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
He touched 283 bugs in the last 48 hours, most of which are FIXED.
If anyone in the QA org reads this list, maybe they could reach out and
teach him how to more effectively contribute?
(I see "[bugday-20160323]" from
Tagging the comments as spam will autoban the account after a certain
number. It will also autocollapse the comments.
Mark
On 2016-04-11 6:35 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> Good intentions or not, we need to stop this activity.
>
> Mark - What's our usual approach to address bug spam?
>
>
Good intentions or not, we need to stop this activity.
Mark - What's our usual approach to address bug spam?
Lawrence
On Monday, 11 April 2016, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> On 2016-04-11 23:32, Emma Humphries wrote:
>
>> Here's the open bugs they have touched http://mzl.la/1Q3w24o
Sent them an email.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Ah, I was looking at open bugs.
>
> Okay, he's either got a script running or something similar.
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-11 23:32,
Ah, I was looking at open bugs.
Okay, he's either got a script running or something similar.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> On 2016-04-11 23:32, Emma Humphries wrote:
>
>> Here's the open bugs they have touched http://mzl.la/1Q3w24o
>>
>
> He touched
On 2016-04-11 23:32, Emma Humphries wrote:
Here's the open bugs they have touched http://mzl.la/1Q3w24o
He touched 283 bugs in the last 48 hours, most of which are FIXED.
Many comments are identical, for example:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1240762
Here's the open bugs they have touched http://mzl.la/1Q3w24o
I realized this morning at the Project Meeting that we still have Monday's
listed as bug triage days and I think there's some supporting structure
around it that we need to give it.
Let me think about that, so we can keep y'all from
12 matches
Mail list logo