Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1
>> Are you including bugs that are about reducing our memory usage >> with more processes? What about doing better sandboxing of the content >> process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information >> from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? > This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505832 > Its major sub-bug that pertains specifically to IPC is > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=fission-ipc Yes, fission-origin-sandbox, fission-ipc and memshrink-content are all important parts of Fission and we need to triage the associated sub-bugs into appropriate Fission milestones. I'll reach out to you on a separate thread. Thanks, Neha. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1
On 2019-02-13 9:02 p.m., Tom Ritter wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:48 PM Matthew N. wrote: What about doing better sandboxing of the content process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505832 Its major sub-bug that pertains specifically to IPC is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=fission-ipc For now, the focus on Fission is just getting it working, these efforts (stronger sandboxing) will come after that. I quoted the part about the milestone flag as I was wondering whether we are supposed to nominate such bugs now or we should only be nominating functional bugs? (Same goes for memory usage ones.) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:48 PM Matthew N. wrote: > What about doing better sandboxing of the content > process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information > from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505832 Its major sub-bug that pertains specifically to IPC is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=fission-ipc For now, the focus on Fission is just getting it working, these efforts (stronger sandboxing) will come after that. -tom ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1
On 2019-02-04 6:02 a.m., Nika Layzell wrote: If have a bug which may be relevant to fission,*please* let us know by setting the “Fission Milestone” project flag to ‘?’. We’ll swing by and triage it into the correct milestone. It seems to me like there are a few overlapping areas in progress that are related but I'm not sure if they are now being tracked under one Fission umbrella… What types of bugs are considered part of the Fission project? Are you including bugs that are about reducing our memory usage with more processes? What about doing better sandboxing of the content process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? Thanks, Matthew N. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
