Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-05-10 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
In the CSSWG April F2F in Berlin this was extensively discussed and the CSSWG allowed / recommended us to unprefix this despite changing the spec. Just landed the change unprefixing this on inbound, let me know if you see something broken because of it. Thanks! -- Emilio On 3/26/18 9:16

Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-05-10 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Sorry for not following up on this earlier, Ehsan, somehow this slipped through my inbox. On 4/6/18 1:26 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: ::-moz-selection seems like a fairly popular feature. PublicWWW claims it's seen on a million sites: https://publicwww.com/websites/%22%3A%3A-moz-selection%22/

Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-03-31 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 03/28/2018 12:09 AM, twisniew...@mozilla.com wrote: > On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:38:56 PM UTC-4, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: >> That looks like an easy fix though, I'll ensure it gets fixed before >> landing. Filed bug 1449010. > > If it helps, I had a patchset for this in bug 292563,

Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-03-28 Thread twisniewski
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:38:56 PM UTC-4, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > That looks like an easy fix though, I'll ensure it gets fixed before > landing. Filed bug 1449010. If it helps, I had a patchset for this in bug 292563, but ran into an odd reftest failure that I never had time to

Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-03-27 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 3/26/18 4:13 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 3/26/18 3:16 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: However other engines have shipped this unprefixed for a long time with the same semantics that we implement https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509958#c14 claims the semantics are not actually

Re: Intent to unprefix: ::-moz-selection.

2018-03-26 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/26/18 3:16 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: However other engines have shipped this unprefixed for a long time with the same semantics that we implement https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509958#c14 claims the semantics are not actually quite the same. Have we done some testing