Nick,
We are in discussions with Intesa Sanpaolo about implementing/pursuing
OneCRL or a similar approach (e.g. outright revocation of the CAs).
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy
[mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+ben=digicert@lists.mozilla.org] On
Behalf Of
On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 2:49:20 AM UTC-5, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 20/07/17 21:31, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > Broadly, yes, but there's unfortunately a shade of IP issues that make it
> > more difficult to contribute as directly as Gerv proposed. Gerv may accept
> > any changes to the Mozilla
On 22/07/2017 02:38, birge...@princeton.edu wrote:
On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 5:06:42 PM UTC-5, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
It seems that a group of Princeton researchers just presented a live
theoretical* misissuance by Let's Encrypt.
They did a sub-prefix hijack via a technique other than
Hi Rick,
Some more thoughts on your post. I continue to invite community
commentary on the issues we are discussing.
On 21/07/17 07:00, Rick Andrews wrote:
> In our June 1 post, we stated that we would update the community after the
> end of the month.
Indeed. I was more referring to the
On 20/07/17 21:31, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Broadly, yes, but there's unfortunately a shade of IP issues that make it
> more difficult to contribute as directly as Gerv proposed. Gerv may accept
> any changes to the Mozilla side, but if the goal is to modify the Baseline
> Requirements, you'd need to
5 matches
Mail list logo
