Ben,
I'm about to use the term 'paragraph' to refer to the text within section
5.3.1 that is separated by carriage returns.
The prior version of the policy contained the language in the final
paragraph of section 5.3.1 - see
The problem with the wording of the paragraphs in section 5.3.1 is that they
should have said "..., in order to be considered Technically Constrained,
..." . Right now they read like absolutes.
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy
Which "above paragraph" is being referenced in the following excerpt from
Section 5.3.1 of the Mozilla Root Store Policy v.2.5
(https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/)?
"Instead of complying with the above paragraph, intermediate certificates
Thank you for reporting this issue. I have created
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428877 to track the issue and
SwissSign's response.
- Wayne
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Reinhard Dietrich via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> To whom it may
To whom it may concern
We have to inform you about a mis-issuance of a SSL multi-domain certificate
with a wrong SAN entry showing the word “dns” again (no valid FQDN). We
detected this error this morning based on our now implemented cablint based
error detection system. The certificate
5 matches
Mail list logo
